POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Senate Hearing on 2018 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Budget

Original title: ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018

Record date · January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

The Senate Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development held a hearing to review the proposed $952 million fiscal year 2018 budget for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The discussion focused on the agency's role in overseeing nuclear power safety, the ongoing challenge of nuclear waste disposal, and the licensing of new reactor technologies.

Why it matters

The hearing sets the stage for federal funding of nuclear safety oversight and determines the government's approach to managing nuclear waste, which impacts the operational viability of the nation's 99 commercial nuclear reactors.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Nuclear power plant operators

These entities pay the fees that offset the majority of the NRC's annual budget.

Directly affected

Department of Energy

The agency is responsible for managing nuclear waste and pursuing the Yucca Mountain repository license.

Key Facts

  • The proposed fiscal year 2018 budget for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is $952 million.
  • The budget represents a $12 million increase over the fiscal year 2017 budget.
  • $814 million of the NRC budget is funded through fees paid by licensed utilities and facilities.
  • The budget includes $30 million to restart the review of the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository license application.
Show all 8 facts
  • The NRC oversees 99 commercial nuclear reactors in the United States.
  • Nuclear power currently provides 20 percent of the nation's electricity and over 60 percent of its carbon-free electricity.
  • The subcommittee plans to hold four budget hearings during the month of June 2017.
  • The hearing identified four priority areas: nuclear waste disposal, license extensions for existing reactors, licensing of advanced/modular reactors, and operational efficiency.

Frequently Asked Questions

How is the Nuclear Regulatory Commission funded?
The agency is primarily funded through fees paid by the utilities and facilities it regulates, which cover $814 million of its $952 million budget.
What is the status of the Yucca Mountain project?
The federal government is considering restarting the review of the license application for the Yucca Mountain repository, with $30 million proposed in the 2018 budget for this purpose.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Restarting Yucca Mountain Review

The 2018 budget proposal explicitly includes $30 million to restart the licensing review for the Yucca Mountain repository, signaling a potential shift in federal activity regarding the long-stalled project.

Connected Entities

Lamar Alexander, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Kristine Svinicki and 3 more
PersonLamar Alexander“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development”Map →
OrganizationNuclear Regulatory Commission“Independent federal agency responsible for nuclear safety”Map →
PersonKristine Svinicki“Chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission”Map →
PersonJeff Baran“Commissioner of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission”Map →
PersonDianne Feinstein“Senator and ranking member of the subcommittee”Map →
PersonStephen Burns“Commissioner of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance80
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record