POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

The FOREST Act: Streamlining Communications Infrastructure on National Forest Land

Original title: FOREST Act

Record date · September 3, 2024

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

This bill simplifies the process for installing communications equipment, such as cell towers, on National Forest System lands by exempting certain projects from standard environmental and historical review requirements. It applies to projects located on existing infrastructure or areas that have already undergone environmental analysis.

Why it matters

This legislation could accelerate the deployment of broadband and cellular services in rural areas by reducing the time and regulatory burden required to obtain federal permits for communications facilities on public forest lands.

Background
  • The National Forest System is managed by the U.S. Forest Service, an agency within the U.S. Department of Agriculture. context
  • The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is a foundational environmental law requiring federal agencies to evaluate the environmental impacts of proposed federal actions. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Telecommunications companies

These companies may experience shorter wait times and reduced regulatory requirements when applying for permits to install equipment on National Forest lands.

Directly affected

Forest Service

The agency is relieved of the requirement to re-conduct environmental or historical consultations for previously analyzed areas.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill remove all environmental oversight for forest land?
No. The exemption only applies to areas where environmental or historical reviews have already been conducted or where the equipment is being added to existing infrastructure.
Who is responsible for implementing these changes?
The Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the Forest Service, is responsible for managing these authorizations.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently filed. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Committee.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Regulatory Streamlining

The bill represents a shift toward prioritizing infrastructure deployment speed over redundant environmental reviews on previously studied public lands.

Connected Entities

Forest Service, Secretary of Agriculture, Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 and 4 more
OrganizationForest Service“Operates under the Secretary of Agriculture”Map →
PersonSecretary of Agriculture“Responsible for implementing the bill”Map →
bill numberAgriculture Improvement Act of 2018“Defines key terms”Map →
bill numberNational Environmental Policy Act of 1969“Environmental law being affected”Map →
locationNational Forest System Lands“Area affected by the bill”Map →
PersonJohnson of South Dakota“Introduced the bill”Map →
PersonBacon“Co-sponsored the bill”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.congress.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record