The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Arizona House passes resolution formally censuring and expressing disapproval of Attorney General's public statements
Last action · February 5, 2026: Transmit to Secretary of StateSponsor: Joseph Chaplik
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
The Arizona House of Representatives passed a formally expressing disapproval of and censuring the Arizona Attorney General for public legal statements regarding the use of force against law enforcement officers. The resolution calls on the Attorney General to retract her rhetoric, issue clarifying guidance supporting law enforcement, and resign from office.
The measure places the state legislature in direct formal conflict with the state's chief legal officer over official legal interpretations, setting a precedent for legislative oversight of executive branch statements.
- The Arizona House of Representatives is the lower chamber of the Arizona State Legislature. context
- HR 2004 was introduced during the Fifty-seventh Legislature's Second Regular Session in 2026. context
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Arizona Attorney General
Subject to formal legislative censure, public disapproval, and a direct call for resignation.
Law enforcement officers
Subject of legislative declarations aiming to uphold officer safety and express support.
Key Facts
- The Arizona House of Representatives formally expresses disapproval of the Arizona Attorney General's public statements regarding the use of force against law enforcement officers.
- The resolution states that the Attorney General's commentary on deadly force against federal, state, and local law enforcement officers was materially incomplete, inaccurate, or insufficiently qualified.
- The measure asserts that the Attorney General is using state resources to selectively solicit complaints targeting United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers.
- The resolution calls on the Arizona Attorney General to retract her commentary concerning the use of deadly force against law enforcement officers.
Show all 7 facts
- The resolution calls on the Attorney General to issue a public statement expressing support for all federal, state, and local law enforcement officers, including those serving in United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
- The measure calls on the Arizona Attorney General to resign from her position due to a loss of trust from law enforcement officers.
- The Arizona House of Representatives formally censures the Arizona Attorney General.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does HR 2004 do?
Does HR 2004 have the force of law to remove the Attorney General?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Current status: signed.
Procedural history
6 actions- Feb 5, 2026EnrolledTransmit to Secretary of State
- Feb 5, 2026HouseFloorPASSED
- Feb 5, 2026HouseDP
- Feb 4, 2026HouseFloorHouse Second Reading
- Feb 4, 2026HouseDP/C&P
- Feb 3, 2026HouseIntroducedHouse First Reading
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Voting Record
Passed
Total
60
- Yes
- 33
- No
- 25
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 2
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (58)
34 more members
Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Legislative Censure of Executive Official
The Arizona House utilized a concurrent resolution to formally censure a statewide elected constitutional officer over public commentary.
Connected Entities
Sources
apps.azleg.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy90Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment45Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz75Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
