POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Arizona House passes resolution formally censuring and expressing disapproval of Attorney General's public statements

Original title: disapproval; attorney general; public statements

Last action · February 5, 2026: Transmit to Secretary of StateSponsor: Joseph Chaplik

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

The Arizona House of Representatives passed a formally expressing disapproval of and censuring the Arizona Attorney General for public legal statements regarding the use of force against law enforcement officers. The resolution calls on the Attorney General to retract her rhetoric, issue clarifying guidance supporting law enforcement, and resign from office.

Why it matters

The measure places the state legislature in direct formal conflict with the state's chief legal officer over official legal interpretations, setting a precedent for legislative oversight of executive branch statements.

Background
  • The Arizona House of Representatives is the lower chamber of the Arizona State Legislature. context
  • HR 2004 was introduced during the Fifty-seventh Legislature's Second Regular Session in 2026. context

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Arizona Attorney General

Subject to formal legislative censure, public disapproval, and a direct call for resignation.

Directly affected

Law enforcement officers

Subject of legislative declarations aiming to uphold officer safety and express support.

Key Facts

  • The Arizona House of Representatives formally expresses disapproval of the Arizona Attorney General's public statements regarding the use of force against law enforcement officers.
  • The resolution states that the Attorney General's commentary on deadly force against federal, state, and local law enforcement officers was materially incomplete, inaccurate, or insufficiently qualified.
  • The measure asserts that the Attorney General is using state resources to selectively solicit complaints targeting United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers.
  • The resolution calls on the Arizona Attorney General to retract her commentary concerning the use of deadly force against law enforcement officers.
Show all 7 facts
  • The resolution calls on the Attorney General to issue a public statement expressing support for all federal, state, and local law enforcement officers, including those serving in United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
  • The measure calls on the Arizona Attorney General to resign from her position due to a loss of trust from law enforcement officers.
  • The Arizona House of Representatives formally censures the Arizona Attorney General.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does HR 2004 do?
It formally expresses the Arizona House of Representatives' disapproval of and s the Arizona Attorney General over public statements concerning the use of force against law enforcement officers.
Does HR 2004 have the force of law to remove the Attorney General?
No, it is a expressing the opinion and of the House of Representatives and calls for her resignation, but it does not remove her from office.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: signed.

Procedural history

6 actions
  1. Feb 5, 2026Enrolled
    Transmit to Secretary of State
  2. Feb 5, 2026HouseFloor
    PASSED
  3. Feb 5, 2026House
    DP
  4. Feb 4, 2026HouseFloor
    House Second Reading
  5. Feb 4, 2026House
    DP/C&P
  6. Feb 3, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House First Reading

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Voting Record

Motion succeededHouse2/5/2026Arizona LegislatureOfficial roll call ↗

Passed

Total

60

Yes
33
No
25
Present
0
Not voting
2
Abstain
0

How they voted (58)

34 more members

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Legislative Censure of Executive Official

The Arizona House utilized a concurrent resolution to formally censure a statewide elected constitutional officer over public commentary.

Connected Entities

United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Arizona Attorney General, Katie Hobbs and 2 more
OrganizationUnited States Immigration and Customs Enforcement“Federal law enforcement agency referenced in the resolution”Map →
OrganizationArizona Attorney General“Subject of legislative censure and disapproval”Map →
PersonKatie Hobbs“Arizona Governor quoted describing comments as inappropriate”Map →
otherArizona Constitution“Establishes the Attorney General as chief legal officer”Map →
OrganizationArizona House of Representatives“Legislative body passing the concurrent resolution”Map →

Sources

Open source document

apps.azleg.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy90
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment45
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz75
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record