The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Oversight Hearing: U.S. Copyright Office
Record date · January 1, 2023
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
The House Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet held an hearing on September 27, 2023, to review the operations and responsibilities of the U.S. Copyright Office. The hearing focused on the constitutional mandate to promote the progress of science and useful arts through copyright protection.
This hearing serves as a formal review of how the U.S. Copyright Office manages intellectual property rights, which directly impacts the legal protections and economic incentives for creators and the public's access to creative works.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Creators and Authors
Their intellectual property rights and the legal framework for protecting their work are governed by the U.S. Copyright Office.
General Public
The public's access to creative works is determined by the balance of copyright laws overseen by the office.
Key Facts
- The hearing was held on September 27, 2023, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
- The Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet conducted the oversight session.
- The primary witness was Shira Perlmutter, Register of Copyrights and Director of the U.S. Copyright Office.
- The hearing addressed the constitutional mandate to promote the progress of science and useful arts.
Show all 5 facts
- The subcommittee is tasked with balancing copyright protections for creators against the public's interest in accessing creative works.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Constitutional Mandate Review
The subcommittee explicitly framed the hearing around the constitutional mandate to 'promote the progress of science and useful arts,' suggesting a focus on the balance between creator rights and public access.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance40How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools