POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Congressional Oversight Hearing on Federal Tribal Recognition Rules

Original title: OVERSIGHT HEARING ON THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION'S PART 83 REVISIONS AND HOW THEY MAY ALLOW THE INTERIOR DEPARTMENT TO CREATE TRIBES, NOT RECOGNIZE THEM

Record date · January 1, 2015

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is a transcript record of a 2015 House subcommittee hearing regarding revisions to '' regulations, which govern how the U.S. Department of the Interior grants to Native American tribes. Lawmakers and witnesses debated whether these changes improve the recognition process or grant the executive branch too much authority to create new tribes.

Why it matters

The regulations determine which groups are officially recognized as tribes, a status that grants them sovereign rights, federal funding eligibility, and land-use authority.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Native American Tribes

The recognition process determines their legal status, access to federal services, and sovereign rights.

Directly affected

U.S. Department of the Interior

The agency is responsible for implementing and enforcing the Part 83 recognition criteria.

Directly affected

State Governments

State governments are often involved in legal disputes regarding tribal recognition, particularly concerning land use and gaming rights.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on April 22, 2015, before the Subcommittee on Indian, Insular and Alaska Native Affairs.
  • The subject of the hearing was the Obama Administration's revisions to 'Part 83' of the Code of Federal Regulations.
  • Part 83 defines the criteria and process for the federal government to acknowledge a group as an Indian tribe.
  • Critics of the revisions argued that the changes might allow the Department of the Interior to 'create' tribes rather than merely recognizing existing ones.
Show all 6 facts
  • The hearing included testimony from federal officials, tribal leaders, and legal experts.
  • The record includes written statements from various members of Congress and state officials, including the Attorney General of Connecticut.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Part 83?
is the section of federal regulations that sets the standards and procedures for the Department of the Interior to officially recognize a group as an Indian tribe.
Why were these regulations controversial?
Some members of Congress and witnesses expressed concern that the 2015 revisions lowered the threshold for recognition, potentially allowing the executive branch to grant tribal status to groups that did not meet historical criteria.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Executive Authority in Tribal Recognition

The hearing documents a significant pushback against administrative changes to tribal recognition, reflecting a broader tension between legislative oversight and executive rulemaking.

Connected Entities

U.S. Department of the Interior, Raul Ruiz, Don Young and 3 more
OrganizationU.S. Department of the Interior“Federal agency responsible for tribal recognition”Map →
PersonRaul Ruiz“Ranking Democratic Member of the Subcommittee”Map →
PersonDon Young“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Indian, Insular and Alaska Native Affairs”Map →
OrganizationNational Congress of American Indians“Represented by Brian Cladoosby”Map →
PersonKevin K. Washburn“Assistant Secretary, Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior”Map →
PersonRichard Blumenthal“U.S. Senator from Connecticut”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record