POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Connecticut requires children under twelve to wear life jackets on public docks and piers starting October 2026

Original title: AN ACT ESTABLISHING A PERSONAL FLOTATION DEVICE REQUIREMENT FOR CHILDREN UNDER THE AGE OF TWELVE WHILE ON PUBLIC DOCKS, WHARVES AND PIERS.

Last action · April 1, 2026: File Number 299Sponsors: Ben McGorty and 2 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Children under the age of 12 must wear a while on any public dock, wharf, or pier in Connecticut, beginning October 1, 2026. This state-level requirement supersedes any conflicting municipal charters, special acts, or s.

Background
  • State legislatures frequently adopt specific safety gear mandates for children participating in aquatic and water-adjacent recreation to reduce drowning hazards. context
  • The Public Safety and Security Committee evaluates legislative measures dealing with emergency services, public safety standards, and state regulatory oversight in Connecticut. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Children under the age of twelve

Children under 12 must wear a personal flotation device at all times while on public docks, wharfs, or piers.

Directly affected

Department of Energy and Environmental Protection

The department incurs minimal costs up to $10,000 for purchasing educational flotation devices and posting new public signage.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who must wear a personal flotation device under this bill?
Any child under the age of twelve must wear a while on any public dock, wharf, or pier in the state.
When does this new requirement start?
The requirement becomes effective on October 1, 2026.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · on the Senate floor.

Procedural history

9 actions
  1. Apr 1, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    File Number 299
  2. Apr 1, 2026Senate
    Senate Calendar Number 209
  3. Apr 1, 2026Senate
    Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, Senate
  4. Apr 1, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners' Office
  5. Mar 26, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Referred to Office of Legislative Research and Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/31/26 5:00 PM
  6. Mar 17, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Filed with Legislative Commissioners' Office
Show 3 earlier actions
  1. Mar 17, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Joint Favorable
  2. Feb 27, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Public Hearing 03/05
  3. Feb 26, 2026Connecticut General AssemblyCommittee
    Referred to Joint Committee on Public Safety and Security

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference100% confidence

Identical Companion Bill

HB 5273 was favorably reported by the Children Committee with identical provisions to SB 371.

Connected Entities

Public Safety and Security Committee, Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, Ben McGorty and 3 more
OrganizationPublic Safety and Security Committee“Legislative committee that reported the bill.”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Energy and Environmental Protection“State agency responsible for environmental programs and educational signage incu”Map →
PersonBen McGorty“Representative for the 122nd District and bill cosponsor.”Map →
PersonHerron Gaston“Senator for the 23rd District and bill cosponsor.”Map →
PersonJoseph P. Gresko“Representative for the 121st District and bill cosponsor.”Map →
OrganizationChildren Committee“Legislative committee that favorably reported related bill HB 5273.”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 45)
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record