Approval of Docking Extension Agreement in Pompano Beach

Original title: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF POMPANO BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE PROPER CITY OFFICIALS TO EXECUTE A DOCKING EXTENSION AGREEMENT AMONG PERRY W. ABRAMS AND KIMBERLY ABRAMS AND ANDREW PILLEY AND VICKY PILLEY, AND THE CITY OF POMPANO BEACH; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (Fiscal Impact: N/A)

Record date · April 22, 2025

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

The Pompano Beach City Commission has approved a authorizing a docking extension agreement between the city and four private residents. This agreement formalizes the legal terms for the extension of a dock structure.

Why it matters

This grants specific property-related docking rights to Perry W. Abrams, Kimberly Abrams, Andrew Pilley, and Vicky Pilley, establishing the legal framework for their dock's extension on city-regulated property.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Perry W. Abrams, Kimberly Abrams, Andrew Pilley, and Vicky Pilley

These individuals are parties to the agreement and receive authorization for a dock extension.

Directly affected

City of Pompano Beach

The city is a signatory to the agreement and is responsible for executing the contract.

Key Facts

The City Commission approved a docking extension agreement.
The agreement involves the City of Pompano Beach and four individuals: Perry W. Abrams, Kimberly Abrams, Andrew Pilley, and Vicky Pilley.
The resolution is identified by file number 25-278.
The resolution was introduced on April 8, 2025.

Show all 6 facts

The resolution was processed as part of the Consent Agenda.
The document states there is no fiscal impact to the city.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this resolution do?

It authorizes the city to sign a legal agreement allowing specific residents to extend a dock.

Does this cost the city money?

No, the document explicitly states the fiscal impact is N/A (not applicable).

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Follow the record

Votes, people, money & the original source

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sources

Open source document

webapi.legistar.com

Analysis Score

0–100

Significance20
How much this matters to a regular citizen
Controversy5
Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
Entertainment5
Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
Buzz10
Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools