Congressional Hearing on Lending Discrimination and Economic Impacts
January 1, 2021
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This hearing serves as a formal legislative inquiry into systemic barriers in the mortgage and lending markets that impact the financial stability and wealth accumulation of borrowers of color.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Borrowers of color
The hearing examines systemic lending practices that directly impact their access to credit and long-term economic outcomes.
Financial institutions
These entities are subject to oversight regarding their lending practices and compliance with fair housing laws.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2021.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on February 24, 2021, via Webex.
- The hearing focused on 'invidious discrimination' in lending and its long-term economic impacts on borrowers of color.
- Five expert witnesses provided testimony: Cheryl R. Cooper, William Darity, Jr., Frances Espinoza, Andre M. Perry, and Lisa Rice.
- The subcommittee entered several documents into the record, including studies from the Federal Reserve Banks of Atlanta and Boston and a GAO study on fair lending.
- The hearing was conducted under the authority of the 117th Congress, First Session.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
Why It Matters
This hearing serves as a formal legislative inquiry into systemic barriers in the mortgage and lending markets that impact the financial stability and wealth accumulation of borrowers of color.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Show 1 more sponsor
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Focus on Long-term Economic Impacts
The hearing explicitly linked immediate lending discrimination to long-term wealth accumulation gaps for borrowers of color.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools