FEDERALhearing transcript

House Oversight Committee Hearing on Iran Nuclear Deal Narratives

Original title: WHITE HOUSE NARRATIVES ON THE IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL

January 1, 2016

Iran Nuclear Deal Foreign Policy Congressional Oversight White House Communications Executive Privilege

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing highlights a conflict between the legislative and executive branches regarding the oversight of foreign policy communications and the administration's decision to withhold a key official from congressional questioning.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

The committee is exercising its oversight authority to investigate executive branch communications.

White House Administration

The administration is the subject of the committee's inquiry and has declined to provide a specific witness.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript from a May 17, 2016, House Oversight Committee hearing regarding the White House's communication strategy surrounding the Iran Nuclear Deal. The committee discussed concerns over transparency and the administration's refusal to make Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes available for testimony.

Key Facts

The hearing was held on May 17, 2016, by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
The committee formally requested the testimony of Ben Rhodes, which the White House declined via a letter from Counsel W. Neil Eggleston on May 16, 2016.
The committee entered a New York Times Magazine article regarding Ben Rhodes into the official record.
The committee entered a letter from Senators John Cornyn, Mark Kirk, and John Barrasso regarding the Iran deal into the record.
The committee entered an IAEA report on Iran's nuclear verification into the record.
Three expert witnesses provided testimony: Michael Rubin, Michael Doran, and John Hannah.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why was Ben Rhodes not at the hearing?

The White House, through Counsel W. Neil Eggleston, declined the committee's request to make him available for testimony.

What was the main purpose of this hearing?

The committee sought to examine the 'narratives' or communication strategies used by the White House to promote the Iran Nuclear Deal.

Why It Matters

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Executive-Legislative Conflict

The document illustrates a clear refusal by the executive branch to comply with a congressional request for testimony from a senior advisor.

Ben Rhodes W. Neil Eggleston Jason Chaffetz

Connected Entities

personW. Neil Eggleston“Counsel to the President who sent a letter declining the committee's request for”Map →

personJohn Hannah“Witness, Senior Counselor at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies”Map →

personBen Rhodes“Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Advisor for Strategic Co”Map →

personMichael Rubin“Witness, Resident Scholar at The American Enterprise Institute”Map →

personMichael Doran“Witness, Senior Fellow at the Hudson Institute”Map →

personJason Chaffetz“Chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100

Significance65
How much this matters to a regular citizen
Controversy75
Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
Entertainment40
Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
Buzz20
Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools