POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofEPA
FEDERALhearing transcript

Hearing on EPA Ozone Standards and Rural Impact

Original title: REALITY CHECK PART II: THE IMPACT OF EPA'S PROPOSED OZONE STANDARDS ON RURAL AMERICA

January 1, 2015

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing examined how proposed federal air quality regulations could impose new compliance requirements or economic constraints on rural agricultural and industrial sectors.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Rural agricultural producers

These groups face potential changes in regulatory compliance requirements for air quality standards.

State environmental agencies

These agencies are responsible for monitoring and implementing air quality standards set at the federal level.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a 2015 House Subcommittee hearing regarding the potential impacts of proposed EPA ozone air quality standards on rural communities and industries. Witnesses from state agricultural and environmental agencies provided testimony on how these regulations might affect rural economic activities.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on April 29, 2015, by the Subcommittee on Environment of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
  • The primary subject was the impact of the EPA's proposed ozone standards on rural areas.
  • Witnesses included representatives from the Oklahoma State Board of Agriculture, Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management, and the Milk Producers Council.
  • The hearing included formal opening statements from Chairman Jim Bridenstine and Ranking Member Suzanne Bonamici.
  • The record includes post-hearing questions and answers from witnesses Jim Reese, Cara Keslar, Kevin Abernathy, and Todd Hiett.
  • Additional materials were submitted for the record by Representatives Eddie Bernice Johnson, Frank Lucas, and Jim Bridenstine.

Why It Matters

The hearing examined how proposed federal air quality regulations could impose new compliance requirements or economic constraints on rural agricultural and industrial sectors.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
To gather testimony and examine the potential consequences of the EPA's proposed ozone air quality standards specifically for rural communities and agricultural industries.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included state-level agricultural and environmental officials from Oklahoma and Wyoming, a representative from a regional air quality management group, and a representative from the dairy industry.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Rural Impact

The hearing highlights a specific legislative effort to evaluate the disproportionate impact of national air quality standards on rural versus urban areas.

Connected Entities

personKevin AbernathyDirector of Regulatory Affairs, Milk Producers CouncilMap →
personJim BridenstineChairman of the Subcommittee on EnvironmentMap →
personJim ReeseSecretary and Commissioner of Agriculture, OklahomaMap →
organizationEnvironmental Protection AgencyThe federal agency proposing the ozone standardsMap →
personTodd HiettCommissioner, Oklahoma Corporation CommissionMap →
personCara KeslarMonitoring Section Supervisor, Wyoming DEQMap →
personSuzanne BonamiciRanking Minority Member of the SubcommitteeMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record