The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Utah Requires Local Emergency Plans to Include Pet-Friendly Shelters and Grants Governmental Immunity
Last action · March 6, 2026: Senate/ filedSponsor: Jen Plumb
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
This bill requires every county, city, and town in Utah to include at least one emergency shelter that accommodates household pets in its , starting May 6, 2026. It also explicitly grants to local entities regarding their emergency operations plans.
- Emergency operations plans are formal blueprints maintained by local governments to manage disaster response, evacuations, and public safety incidents. context
- Governmental immunity laws protect public entities and their employees from certain types of lawsuits when performing official duties. context
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Counties, cities, and towns
Local governments must update their emergency operations plans to designate at least one pet-accommodating shelter and receive immunity from suit regarding the plan.
Residents with household pets
Residents gain access to designated emergency shelters that accommodate both individuals and their household pets during emergencies.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does my city or town have to build a brand new shelter for pets?
Can a small town partner with a neighboring county to provide a pet shelter?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.
Procedural history
19 actions- Mar 6, 2026SenateSenate/ filed
- Mar 6, 2026SenateSenate/ strike enacting clause
- Mar 4, 2026SenateSenate/ comm rpt/ sent to Rules
- Mar 3, 2026SenateSenate Comm - Recommends Returned to Rules
- Jan 27, 2026ReleasedLFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0070S01
- Jan 27, 2026Version SponsorLFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0070S01
Show 13 earlier actions
- Jan 23, 2026Legislative Fiscal AgencyLFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0070S01
- Jan 23, 2026Legislative Fiscal AnalystLFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0070S01
- Jan 22, 2026SenateSenate Comm - Held
- Jan 20, 2026SenateCommitteeSenate/ to standing committee
- Jan 20, 2026SenateIntroducedSenate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
- Jan 13, 2026SenateSenate/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
- Jan 13, 2026ReleasedLFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0070
- Jan 12, 2026Version SponsorLFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0070
- Jan 7, 2026SenateSenate/ received bill from Legislative Research
- Jan 2, 2026Legislative Fiscal AgencyLFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0070
- Jan 2, 2026Legislative Fiscal AnalystLFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0070
- Jan 2, 2026Legislative Research and General CounselNumbered Bill Publicly Distributed
- Jan 2, 2026Legislative Research and General CounselBill Numbered but not Distributed
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Mandatory Inclusion of Pets in Disaster Planning
Shifts local emergency planning obligations from optional consideration to a mandatory requirement for accommodating household pets.
Sources
le.utah.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz25Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
