POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Missouri bill allows third-class cities to limit legal service contracts to three years upon voter approval

Original title: CITY CONTRACTS FOR LEGAL SERVICES

Last action · May 15, 2026: Referred: Emerging Issues(H)Sponsor: Phil Amato

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

House Bill 2460 permits to cap the terms of outside legal service contracts at three years and require mandatory ding every third year, provided the restriction is approved by local voters via city council referral or public petition.

Why it matters

Establishes a voter-approved mechanism to periodically municipal legal service contracts, changing how long outside law firms can retain city representation without competition.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

third-class cities

Municipalities are granted authority to implement three-year term limits and mandatory rebidding for legal service contracts upon voter approval.

Directly affected

registered voters of third-class cities

Voters decide whether to approve or reject the proposed three-year contract limits and rebidding requirements via ballot.

Directly affected

contract attorneys

Attorneys providing legal services to participating third-class cities face maximum three-year contract terms and mandatory rebidding cycles.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

How can a city adopt the three-year contract limit for legal services?
A city can adopt the limit if the city council votes to place it on the ballot and a majority of voters approve it, or if a petition signed by at least 10% of voters from the last mayoral election triggers a ballot vote that subsequently passes.
What happens if local voters reject the proposed contract limits?
If a majority of registered voters vote against the contract limits, no such limits or mandatory ding rules will apply to the city's legal service contracts.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. May 15, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
  2. Jan 8, 2026HouseFloor
    Read Second Time (H)
  3. Jan 7, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read First Time (H)
  4. Dec 16, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Prefiled (H)

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Joseph Engler, General Assembly, Phil Amato
PersonJoseph Engler“Chief Clerk”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Legislative body of the state of Missouri”Map →
PersonPhil Amato“Representative for District 113 introducing House Bill 2460”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record