POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Congressional Hearing on Voting Rights Act Reforms

Original title: OVERSIGHT OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT: POTENTIAL LEGISLATIVE REFORMS

Record date · January 1, 2022

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is the official record of a House Judiciary Subcommittee hearing held on August 16, 2021, to discuss potential legislative updates to the Voting Rights Act. The hearing featured testimony from government officials, legal experts, and advocacy groups regarding the current state of voting access and federal .

Why it matters

The hearing serves as a formal record of expert and stakeholder testimony that informs potential future federal legislation regarding how elections are administered and monitored across the United States.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

U.S. Citizens

Any changes to the Voting Rights Act resulting from these discussions would impact the legal framework governing voter access and election administration.

Directly affected

State Election Officials

Legislative reforms to the Voting Rights Act would alter the federal requirements and oversight standards for state-level election administration.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on August 16, 2021, under the 117th Congress.
  • The primary subject was oversight of the Voting Rights Act and potential legislative reforms.
  • The hearing was conducted by the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties of the House Committee on the Judiciary.
  • Testimony was provided across two panels involving government officials, legal scholars, and representatives from civil rights and public interest organizations.
Show all 6 facts
  • The record includes submitted reports from the Council of Economic Advisors and the House Administration Committee regarding voter turnout and ballot access.
  • Witnesses included representatives from the Department of Justice, the ACLU, the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, and the Public Interest Legal Foundation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to conduct of the Voting Rights Act and to gather expert testimony on potential legislative reforms to federal election laws.
Who testified at the hearing?
The hearing included testimony from the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, as well as representatives from various legal, civil rights, and public interest organizations.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

Coverage by outlet perspective1 article
Center 1
Blind spot - only covered by center outlets

Bias ratings based on AllSides / Media Bias/Fact Check

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Voting Rights Act Reform

The hearing highlights a concerted effort by the 117th Congress to re-examine federal voting protections following recent judicial interpretations of the Voting Rights Act.

Connected Entities

Kristen Clarke, Steve Cohen, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund and 3 more
PersonKristen Clarke“Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Justice”Map →
PersonSteve Cohen“Chair of the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties”Map →
OrganizationNAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund“Represented by witness Samuel Spital”Map →
PersonMike Johnson“Ranking Member of the Subcommittee”Map →
OrganizationBrennan Center for Justice“Represented by witness Wendy R. Weiser”Map →
OrganizationThe Heritage Foundation“Represented by witness Hans A. von Spakovsky”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record