POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Congressional Hearing on Voting Rights Act Reforms

Original title: OVERSIGHT OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT: POTENTIAL LEGISLATIVE REFORMS

January 1, 2022

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing serves as a formal record of expert and stakeholder testimony that informs potential future federal legislation regarding how elections are administered and monitored across the United States.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

U.S. Citizens

Any changes to the Voting Rights Act resulting from these discussions would impact the legal framework governing voter access and election administration.

State Election Officials

Legislative reforms to the Voting Rights Act would alter the federal requirements and oversight standards for state-level election administration.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2022.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is the official record of a House Judiciary Subcommittee hearing held on August 16, 2021, to discuss potential legislative updates to the Voting Rights Act. The hearing featured testimony from government officials, legal experts, and advocacy groups regarding the current state of voting access and federal .

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on August 16, 2021, under the 117th Congress.
  • The primary subject was oversight of the Voting Rights Act and potential legislative reforms.
  • The hearing was conducted by the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties of the House Committee on the Judiciary.
  • Testimony was provided across two panels involving government officials, legal scholars, and representatives from civil rights and public interest organizations.
  • The record includes submitted reports from the Council of Economic Advisors and the House Administration Committee regarding voter turnout and ballot access.
  • Witnesses included representatives from the Department of Justice, the ACLU, the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, and the Public Interest Legal Foundation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to conduct of the Voting Rights Act and to gather expert testimony on potential legislative reforms to federal election laws.
Who testified at the hearing?
The hearing included testimony from the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, as well as representatives from various legal, civil rights, and public interest organizations.

Why It Matters

The hearing serves as a formal record of expert and stakeholder testimony that informs potential future federal legislation regarding how elections are administered and monitored across the United States.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Voting Rights Act Reform

The hearing highlights a concerted effort by the 117th Congress to re-examine federal voting protections following recent judicial interpretations of the Voting Rights Act.

Connected Entities

personKristen ClarkeAssistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, U.S. Department of JusticeMap →
personSteve CohenChair of the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil LibertiesMap →
organizationNAACP Legal Defense and Educational FundRepresented by witness Samuel SpitalMap →
personMike JohnsonRanking Member of the SubcommitteeMap →
organizationBrennan Center for JusticeRepresented by witness Wendy R. WeiserMap →
organizationThe Heritage FoundationRepresented by witness Hans A. von SpakovskyMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record