The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.West Virginia House Bill 5261 Overhauls Contraband Forfeiture Laws to Require Criminal Convictions
Last action · February 5, 2026: To House JudiciarySponsors: Mike Pushkin and 1 other
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
House Bill 5261 overhaulates West Virginia's contraband forfeiture laws by generally requiring a criminal conviction for property forfeiture, establishing strict protections for innocent owners and secured lienholders, and prohibiting law enforcement agencies from retaining forfeited property for their own use.
The measure shifts property forfeiture procedures from civil to criminal proceedings for seizures under $100,000, establishes explicit exemptions for personal dwellings and low-value assets, and mandates that auction proceeds and forfeited currency be deposited into the State's General Fund.
- State civil asset forfeiture laws have historically allowed law enforcement agencies to seize cash, vehicles, and real property suspected of being connected to criminal activity without requiring a formal criminal conviction. context
- House Bill 5261 was introduced during the 2026 Regular Session of the West Virginia Legislature and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. context
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Property owners
Property owners gain specific exemptions, innocent owner protections, and require criminal convictions for asset forfeiture under $100,000.
Law-enforcement agencies
Law enforcement agencies are prohibited from retaining seized property for personal or agency use and must file detailed annual seizure reports.
Secured lienholders
Bona fide security interest holders are protected from forfeiture unless the state proves by a preponderance of the evidence that they had actual knowledge of the crime.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What property is completely exempt from forfeiture under this bill?
Can law enforcement agencies keep the property they seize?
What happens to the proceeds from forfeited property and public auctions?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.
Procedural history
4 actions- Feb 5, 2026HouseCommitteeTo House Judiciary
- Feb 5, 2026HouseIntroducedIntroduced in House
- Feb 5, 2026HouseCommitteeTo Judiciary
- Feb 5, 2026HouseIntroducedFiled for introduction
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Shift from Civil to Criminal Forfeiture
The legislation marks a significant policy shift by mandating criminal convictions for asset forfeitures under $100,000 and removing law enforcement's ability to retain seized assets.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.wvlegislature.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 85)
- Controversy65Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz40Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools