POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Congressional Hearing on U.S. Leadership in Science and Technology

Original title: MAINTAINING U.S. LEADERSHIP IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

January 1, 2019

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing informs future federal legislation and funding priorities for scientific research and education, which directly impacts national economic competitiveness and security.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

STEM students and workforce

The committee is evaluating policies regarding education and training programs for the future science and technology workforce.

Universities and national labs

These institutions are the primary recipients of federal fundamental research funding and are central to the discussion on maintaining U.S. research leadership.

Private sector R&D firms

The committee is examining how government and private sector partnerships can be improved to maintain national competitiveness.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2019.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology held a hearing on March 6, 2019, to examine the current state of U.S. scientific research and development. Experts and committee members discussed international competition, the need for a skilled workforce, and strategies for government, university, and private sector collaboration.

Key Facts

  • The U.S. currently ranks 11th globally in research intensity.
  • The U.S. has fallen behind several countries in research and development (R&D) spending as a share of GDP.
  • China has surpassed the U.S. in total research publication output.
  • East Asian countries as a group have surpassed the U.S. in total research publication output.
  • The U.S. was the global leader in total R&D dollars invested in 2016, but China likely surpassed the U.S. in 2018.
  • The U.S. is at risk of falling out of the top ten nations for investments in fundamental research.
  • The hearing took place on March 6, 2019, in room 2318 of the Rayburn House Office Building.

Why It Matters

This hearing informs future federal legislation and funding priorities for scientific research and education, which directly impacts national economic competitiveness and security.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the U.S. concerned about its scientific leadership?
The Committee is concerned because data shows the U.S. is falling behind other nations in , R&D investment, and publication output, which may impact future economic and national security.
Who provided expert testimony at this hearing?
The witnesses included Dr. Marcia McNutt (National Academy of Sciences), Dr. Patrick Gallagher (University of Pittsburgh), and Dr. Mehmood Khan (PepsiCo/Council on Competitiveness).

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Shift in Global R&D Leadership

The hearing highlights a documented transition where the U.S. is losing its long-held dominance in research output and investment to China and East Asian nations.

Connected Entities

personFrank D. LucasRanking Member of the CommitteeMap →
personMarcia McNuttPresident of the National Academy of SciencesMap →
personEddie Bernice JohnsonChairwoman of the Committee on Science, Space, and TechnologyMap →
personMehmood KhanVice Chairman and Chief Scientific Officer of PepsiCoMap →
organizationNational Science FoundationSource of data regarding U.S. research intensityMap →
personPatrick GallagherChancellor of the University of PittsburghMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record