Lobbying Activity Report: Smith & Kempton for Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District
June 20, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This document discloses the legislative priorities and financial activity of a public agency's efforts, showing which state bills and budget items the district sought to influence between January and March 2000.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District
The district is the client entity that authorized the lobbying activity to influence state-level policy.
Smith & Kempton
The firm is the service provider responsible for executing the lobbying strategy.
Last recorded activity June 20, 2026.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The lobbying firm Smith & Kempton represented the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District.
- The reporting period for this activity was January 1, 2000, through March 31, 2000.
- Total payments reported for lobbying services during this specific period were $0.
- The lobbying activity focused on two specific bills: AB 2511 and SB 1985.
- The firm also engaged in advocacy regarding state energy and air quality budget issues.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much did the district pay for lobbying during this period?
What specific issues were the lobbyists working on?
Why It Matters
This document discloses the legislative priorities and financial activity of a public agency's efforts, showing which state bills and budget items the district sought to influence between January and March 2000.
News Coverage
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Zero-payment reporting
Despite active lobbying on specific bills, the report lists $0 in payments for the quarter, suggesting either pro-bono work, payment outside this reporting window, or a different fee structure.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.sos.ca.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools