POLISCOPE
Back to feed
CALACCESS COUNTYlobbying

Lobbying Activity Report: Smith & Kempton for Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District

Original title: SMITH & KEMPTON lobbying for SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

June 20, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This document discloses the legislative priorities and financial activity of a public agency's efforts, showing which state bills and budget items the district sought to influence between January and March 2000.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District

The district is the client entity that authorized the lobbying activity to influence state-level policy.

Smith & Kempton

The firm is the service provider responsible for executing the lobbying strategy.

What changed

Last recorded activity June 20, 2026.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This report details activities conducted by the firm Smith & Kempton on behalf of the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District during the first quarter of 2000. The firm focused on monitoring specific state legislation and budget discussions related to energy and air quality.

Key Facts

  • The lobbying firm Smith & Kempton represented the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District.
  • The reporting period for this activity was January 1, 2000, through March 31, 2000.
  • Total payments reported for lobbying services during this specific period were $0.
  • The lobbying activity focused on two specific bills: AB 2511 and SB 1985.
  • The firm also engaged in advocacy regarding state energy and air quality budget issues.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much did the district pay for lobbying during this period?
The report lists payments for this period as $0.
What specific issues were the lobbyists working on?
The lobbyists were focused on AB 2511, SB 1985, and general state energy and air quality budget issues.

Why It Matters

This document discloses the legislative priorities and financial activity of a public agency's efforts, showing which state bills and budget items the district sought to influence between January and March 2000.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

financial connection90% confidence

Zero-payment reporting

Despite active lobbying on specific bills, the report lists $0 in payments for the quarter, suggesting either pro-bono work, payment outside this reporting window, or a different fee structure.

Connected Entities

Sources

Open source document

www.sos.ca.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record