POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofGaming →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Louisiana House Bill 72 authorizes parish governing authorities to hold local referendums on permitting new forms of gaming

Original title: GAMING: Provides for parish elections to permit gaming

Last action · March 9, 2026: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice.Sponsor: Travis Johnson

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Louisiana parish governing authorities are newly authorized to call and conduct local referendum elections on whether to allow forms of state-approved gaming that were not permitted in their parish on January 1, 2026. If approved by a majority of voters in a parish election, specific types of gaming including riverboat gaming, horse racing, video draw poker, and sports wagering will be allowed locally.

Background
  • Louisiana law governs riverboat gaming, horse racing, video draw poker, and sports wagering through specific chapters across Titles 4 and 27 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes. context
  • Local option elections in Louisiana permit individual parishes to decide whether specific regulated industries or activities may operate within their borders. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Parish governing authorities

Parish governing authorities gain discretionary authority to call and conduct local option elections and are required to pay all election costs.

Directly affected

Registered electors in Louisiana parishes

Electors receive the opportunity to vote for or against individual propositions regarding new forms of gaming in their local jurisdictions.

Directly affected

Gaming operators

Operators gain potential pathways to expand operations into additional parishes if local voters approve referendums.

Key Facts

  • Enacts R.S. 18:1300.27 to authorize parish governing authorities to call and conduct local option elections on gaming not allowed in the parish on January 1, 2026.
  • Parish governing authorities may propose riverboat gaming, horse racing, video draw poker, and sports wagering via ordinance or resolution.
  • Ballots must provide a separate proposition for each form of gaming so electors can vote independently for or against each type.
  • A form of gaming becomes allowed in a parish if a majority of electors voting on that specific proposition vote in favor.
Show all 8 facts
  • A form of gaming remains prohibited in a parish if a majority of electors voting on that proposition vote against it.
  • Parish governing authorities are strictly prohibited from placing any form of gaming on the ballot that was already allowed in that parish on January 1, 2026.
  • Elections must comply with the Louisiana Election Code provisions governing proposition elections.
  • The governing authority that calls the election is legally required to pay all associated election costs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which forms of gaming can a parish put on the ballot?
Parishes can put riverboat gaming, horse racing, video draw poker, and sports wagering on the ballot, provided that specific form of gaming was not already allowed in the parish on January 1, 2026.
Who pays for the local gaming referendum election?
The of the parish that calls the election is responsible for paying all costs associated with holding it.
Can a parish hold an election on a form of gaming that was already permitted there before 2026?
No. The bill explicitly prohibits parish governing authorities from including any form of gaming on the ballot if it was already allowed in that parish on January 1, 2026.
How are voters required to vote on multiple forms of gaming?
The parish must provide a separate proposition on the ballot for each form of gaming so that electors may vote independently for or against each individual option.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Mar 9, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice.
  2. Feb 6, 2026House
    First appeared in the Interim Calendar on 2/6/2026.
  3. Feb 3, 2026House
    Prefiled.
  4. Feb 3, 2026HouseCommittee
    Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Decentralized Gaming Approval via Parish Referendum

House Bill 72 shifts the mechanism for introducing new forms of state-approved gaming by enabling individual parish governing authorities to initiate local referendums.

Connected Entities

House Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice, Travis Johnson
OrganizationHouse Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice“Committee assigned to review House Bill 72.”Map →
PersonTravis Johnson“Representative who introduced House Bill 72.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legis.la.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy55
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record