POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Louisiana allows electronic access to protected witness videotapes for defense attorneys

Original title: CRIMINAL/PROCEDURE: Provides relative to the electronic access of videotaped statements of protected persons

Last action · May 11, 2026: Effective date: 08/01/2026.Sponsors: Jeremy LaCombe and 5 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

Louisiana law now permits courts and attorneys to fulfill legal requirements for sharing videotaped statements of protected witnesses by providing secure electronic viewing access, effective August 1, 2026. Defendants representing themselves without a lawyer remain barred from independent electronic access, and a physical copy must still be played at trial when introduced as evidence.

Why it matters

Criminal defense attorneys and courts gain a secure electronic method to review protected witness testimony without handing over physical media files, altering pretrial procedures across all criminal and juvenile proceedings.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

criminal defendants' attorneys

Defense counsel may now fulfill discovery requirements by receiving secure electronic viewing access rather than physical media copies.

Directly affected

pro se criminal defendants

Defendants representing themselves are barred from obtaining electronic access to copies of protected persons' videotaped statements.

Directly affected

courts

Judicial bodies may accept secure electronic viewing access as satisfying legal copy requirements for protected witness statements.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a defendant representing themselves view the videotaped statement electronically?
No. The law explicitly prohibits criminal defendants from gaining independent electronic access to copies of s' videotaped statements.
Does this law eliminate the need to play videotaped statements at trial?
No. The law maintains the requirement that a physical copy of the videotaped statement must be produced at a criminal trial when a party introduces it as evidence.
When does this law go into effect?
The measure takes effect on August 1, 2026.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

20 actions
  1. May 11, 2026SenateEnrolled
    Signed by the President of the Senate on 5/7/2026.
  2. May 11, 2026HouseEnrolled
    Signed by the Governor. Becomes Act No. 91.
  3. May 11, 2026House
    Effective date: 08/01/2026.
  4. May 8, 2026House
    Sent to the Governor for executive approval.
  5. May 7, 2026House
    Received from the Senate without amendments.
  6. May 7, 2026HouseEnrolled
    Enrolled and signed by the Speaker of the House.
Show 14 earlier actions
  1. May 6, 2026SenateFloor
    Read by title, passed by a vote of 35 yeas and 0 nays, and ordered returned to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
  2. Apr 27, 2026SenateFloor
    Reported without Legislative Bureau amendments. Read by title and passed to third reading and final passage.
  3. Apr 22, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.
  4. Apr 21, 2026SenateCommittee
    Reported favorably.
  5. Apr 14, 2026SenateCommittee
    Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary C.
  6. Apr 13, 2026Senate
    Received in the Senate. Read first time by title and placed on the Calendar for a second reading.
  7. Apr 8, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, returned to the calendar.
  8. Apr 8, 2026House
    Called from the calendar.
  9. Apr 8, 2026HouseFloor
    Read third time by title, amended, roll called on final passage, yeas 99, nays 0. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
  10. Apr 7, 2026House
    Scheduled for floor debate on 04/08/2026.
  11. Apr 1, 2026HouseFloor
    Read by title, ordered engrossed, passed to 3rd reading.
  12. Mar 31, 2026HouseCommittee
    Reported favorably (10-0).
  13. Mar 24, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice.
  14. Mar 23, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title. Lies over under the rules.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Francis Thompson, Annie Spell, Steven Jackson and 3 more
PersonFrancis Thompson“Co-sponsor of House Bill No. 995”Map →
PersonAnnie Spell“Co-sponsor of House Bill No. 995”Map →
PersonSteven Jackson“Co-sponsor of House Bill No. 995”Map →
PersonJeremy LaCombe“Lead sponsor of House Bill No. 995”Map →
PersonChasity Martinez“Co-sponsor of House Bill No. 995”Map →
PersonMike Johnson“Co-sponsor of House Bill No. 995”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legis.la.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record