POLISCOPE
Back to feed
S4435FEDERALin_committee
High Impact

Families Over Fees Act of 2024

April 29, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Currently in_committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Last action
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.May 23, 2024
Lead sponsor

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

If passed, this bill would limit the costs of services like phone calls or money transfers for incarcerated people and their families by prohibiting excessive fees and requiring transparent pricing.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Incarcerated individuals and their families

They are the primary consumers of the goods and services covered by the bill and would be protected from excessive fees.

Companies providing services to correctional facilities

These entities must comply with new disclosure requirements and fee limitations, and face potential litigation for violations.

State Attorneys General

They are granted the authority to bring civil actions in federal court to enforce these regulations on behalf of their residents.

What changed

Current stage: in_committee.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

This bill aims to regulate the fees charged to incarcerated individuals and their families for goods and services. It requires companies to clearly disclose total prices, prohibits excessive fees, and establishes enforcement mechanisms for the Federal Trade Commission, state attorneys general, and private citizens.

Key Facts

  • Requires covered entities to clearly and conspicuously display the total price of goods or services, including all mandatory fees.
  • Prohibits the charging of excessive mandatory fees for goods or services provided to incarcerated individuals.
  • Establishes criteria for determining 'excessive' fees, including cost proportionality, the reason for the fee, and the availability of alternatives.
  • Prohibits excessive fees for early contract termination.
  • Mandates that companies disclose refund policies before transactions and provide full refunds for undelivered or defective goods/services.
  • Exempts government-levied taxes and delivery fees (if disclosed) from these regulations.
  • Empowers the Federal Trade Commission to treat violations as unfair or deceptive acts under the Federal Trade Commission Act.
  • Allows state attorneys general to bring civil actions on behalf of residents to enjoin violations and seek damages or restitution.
  • Provides a private right of action, allowing individuals to sue for damages, injunctive relief, and attorney's fees in federal court.
  • Permits class action lawsuits under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill apply to taxes or government fees?
No, the bill explicitly states that it does not apply to any tax, duty, or custom levied by local, state, or federal government entities.
Can I sue a company if I am charged an excessive fee?
Yes, the bill provides a , allowing individuals to bring civil lawsuits in federal court to seek damages, restitution, or other relief.
How will the government decide if a fee is 'excessive'?
The Federal Trade Commission will consider factors such as whether the fee is proportional to the cost of the service, why the fee is charged, the cost of similar services for non-incarcerated people, and whether the consumer had other options.

Why It Matters

If passed, this bill would limit the costs of services like phone calls or money transfers for incarcerated people and their families by prohibiting excessive fees and requiring transparent pricing.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Expansion of State Enforcement

The bill explicitly grants state attorneys general the power to enforce federal consumer protection standards in federal court, a mechanism designed to increase oversight capacity.

Connected Entities

personElizabeth WarrenUnited States Senator who co-sponsored the bill.Map →
personCory BookerUnited States Senator who introduced the bill.Map →
organizationFederal Trade CommissionPrimary federal agency responsible for enforcing the bill's provisions.Map →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record