POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

North Carolina Requires Prominent Labeling on Cell-Cultured and Insect-Protein Food Products

Original title: Food Labeling Transparency Act.

Last action · April 8, 2025: Re-ref Com On Agriculture and Environment (House action)Sponsors: Karl Gillespie and 20 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

The General Assembly of North Carolina requires cell-cultured and insect-protein meat and poultry products sold at retail or served in restaurants to feature prominent qualifying terms like 'cell-cultured' or 'lab-grown' near their names, effective October 1, 2025.

Why it matters

Manufacturers and restaurants must alter packaging and menus to explicitly identify lab-grown or insect-based proteins, shifting compliance liability solely to manufacturers for retail products and making disclosure a condition of restaurant health permits.

Background
  • State legislatures across the United States have increasingly introduced bills regulating the labeling and marketing of cell-cultured and plant-based meat substitutes to distinguish them from conventionally farmed animal products. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Manufacturers of manufactured-protein food products

Manufacturers must ensure retail packages and labeling of cell-cultured or insect-protein products contain designated qualifying terms and bear sole legal liability for compliance.

Directly affected

Restaurants and food establishments

Food establishments must add explicit parenthetical disclosures to menus for any items containing manufactured-protein ingredients as a condition of receiving or renewing their health permits.

Key Facts

  • Cell-cultured and insect-protein meat products using identifying meat terms must display a qualifying term in prominent type and close proximity to the product name.
  • Responsibility for retail labeling compliance rests solely with the manufacturer, and enforcement against retailers is prohibited under G.S. 106-549.23(3).
  • Cell-cultured and insect-protein poultry products using identifying poultry terms must also display a qualifying term on packaging.
  • Food establishments offering manufactured-protein items must clearly disclose them on menus using parenthetical statements such as '(Contains Artificial/Cell-Cultured Food Product)' or '(Lab-Grown)'.
Show all 7 facts
  • Compliance with menu disclosure requirements is mandatory for obtaining or renewing food establishment permits enforced by the Department and local health departments.
  • Qualifying terms legally include terms such as 'cell-cultured', 'cultivated', 'cell-cultivated', 'fake', 'grown in a lab', 'insect', 'insect-based', 'insect-protein', 'lab-created', and 'lab-grown'.
  • The provisions of Sections 1, 2, and 3 become effective on October 1, 2025, and apply to products sold or offered for sale on or after that date.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is legally responsible if a packaged manufactured-protein product lacks the required label?
Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the manufacturer of the manufactured-protein food product, not the retailer.
How must restaurants indicate that a menu item contains manufactured-protein food products?
Restaurants must include a parenthetical or bracketed statement immediately following the menu item's name, in a font size no smaller than the item name, using terms like '(Contains Artificial/)' or '(Lab-Grown)'.
When do these labeling requirements take effect?
The provisions become effective on October 1, 2025, and apply to products and menu items sold or offered for sale on or after that date.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

7 actions
  1. Apr 8, 2025House
    Re-ref Com On Agriculture and Environment
  2. Apr 8, 2025House
    Reptd Fav Com Sub 2
  3. Apr 1, 2025House
    Re-ref Com On Commerce and Economic Development
  4. Apr 1, 2025House
    Reptd Fav Com Substitute
  5. Mar 24, 2025House
    Ref to the Com on Health, if favorable, Commerce and Economic Development, if favorable, Agriculture and Environment, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
  6. Mar 24, 2025House
    Passed 1st Reading
Show 1 earlier action
  1. Mar 20, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Shift to Mandatory Disclosure for Alternative Proteins

The legislation integrates cell-cultured and insect-protein regulations directly into existing agricultural and food establishment inspection frameworks under Chapter 106 and Chapter 130A.

Connected Entities

Karl Gillespie, North Carolina, Howard Penny and 2 more
PersonKarl Gillespie“Primary legislative sponsor of the bill”Map →
OrganizationNorth Carolina“Governing state legislature passing the bill”Map →
PersonHoward Penny“Sponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonCody Huneycutt“Sponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonDonnie Loftis“Sponsor of the bill”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz50
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record