POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Hearing on Surface Transportation Security in NY and NJ

Original title: PROTECTING OUR PASSENGERS: PERSPECTIVES ON SECURING SURFACE TRANSPORTATION IN NEW JERSEY AND NEW YORK

Record date · January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is a transcript of a 2016 Congressional held by the House Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Communications. The hearing focused on security strategies and emergency response coordination for systems in the New York and New Jersey region.

Why it matters

The hearing provides a public record of the security challenges and coordination efforts between federal agencies and local transit authorities, which directly impacts the safety protocols and emergency response planning for millions of daily commuters in the NY/NJ area.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Commuters in NY/NJ

The security policies and emergency response plans discussed impact the daily safety and operational procedures of regional transit systems.

Directly affected

Transportation Security Administration

The agency is responsible for implementing federal security policies for surface transportation.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on June 21, 2016, in the 114th Congress.
  • The session was a field hearing conducted by the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Communications.
  • The primary focus was the security of surface transportation systems specifically within the New York and New Jersey region.
  • Testimony was provided by two panels of experts, including representatives from the TSA, Port Authority, MTA, NJ Transit Police, and Amtrak.
Show all 6 facts
  • The second panel included local emergency management and law enforcement officials from Jersey City, New Jersey.
  • The hearing record includes prepared statements from all witnesses and subcommittee leadership.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to gather perspectives on how to better secure systems in the New York and New Jersey area.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included officials from the TSA, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the MTA, NJ Transit Police, Amtrak, and various emergency management and police officials from Jersey City.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Regional Security Focus

The hearing highlights a specific effort by the House Committee on Homeland Security to conduct oversight at the local level in high-density transit corridors.

Connected Entities

Transportation Security Administration, Daniel M. Donovan, Jr., Donald M. Payne, Jr. and 4 more
OrganizationTransportation Security Administration“Federal agency providing testimony on surface transportation security”Map →
PersonDaniel M. Donovan, Jr.“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Communicat”Map →
PersonDonald M. Payne, Jr.“Ranking Member of the Subcommittee”Map →
OrganizationAmtrak“National rail service providing security testimony”Map →
OrganizationNew Jersey Transit Police Department“Law enforcement agency providing security testimony”Map →
OrganizationPort Authority of New York and New Jersey“Regional transportation authority providing security testimony”Map →
OrganizationMetropolitan Transit Authority“Regional transit agency providing security testimony”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record