POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

New Mexico HB 301 authorizes IT projects for the judicial branch and appropriates $1.2 million for district attorney technology

Original title: JUDICIAL BRANCH INFO TECH PROJECTS

Last action · February 3, 2026: Not PrintedSponsor: Rebecca Dow

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

New Mexico HB 301 permits the Department of Information Technology to undertake IT projects for the judicial branch and establishes a $1,200,000 from the general fund for district attorney technology purchases in 2027.

Why it matters

District offices across New Mexico receive $1,200,000 in state funding specifically designated for upgrading technology goods and services during 2027.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

administrative office of the district attorneys

Receives a $1,200,000 general fund appropriation in fiscal year 2027 to purchase technology goods and services for district attorneys statewide.

Directly affected

Department of Information Technology

Gains the authority to undertake IT projects for the judicial branch, establish vendor price agreements, and publish an annual catalog of goods and services.

Directly affected

judicial branch of government

Permitted to engage the Department of Information Technology to undertake information technology projects.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does House Bill 301 do for the judiciary?
It allows the Department of Information Technology to undertake IT projects for any branch of the judiciary and establishes a catalog of available goods and services starting July 1, 2027.
How much money is appropriated in HB 301 and who receives it?
The bill appropriates $1,200,000 from the general fund to the administrative office of the district attorneys for 2027 to purchase technology goods and services statewide.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Feb 3, 2026New Mexico Legislature
    Not Printed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Judicial Access to Centralized IT

The measure expands the authority of the Department of Information Technology to undertake projects specifically for the judicial branch, bridging executive-managed IT services with judicial operations.

Connected Entities

Administrative Office of the District Attorneys, Department of Information Technology, Rebecca Dow and 1 more
OrganizationAdministrative Office of the District Attorneys“Recipient of the $1,200,000 appropriation for statewide district attorney techno”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Information Technology“Empowered to undertake IT projects for the judicial branch and establish price a”Map →
PersonRebecca Dow“Introduced House Bill 301”Map →
locationNew Mexico“State where the legislation was introduced in the 57th legislature”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.nmlegis.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 35)
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record