POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Truth in Caller ID Act of 2009

Last action · December 22, 2010: Became Public Law No: 111-331.

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

This law makes it illegal to knowingly transmit misleading or inaccurate caller ID information with the intent to defraud or cause harm. It grants the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) authority to create regulations and enforce penalties, while also allowing state officials to bring civil actions on behalf of their residents.

Why it matters

This act establishes federal penalties for 'spoofing'—the practice of falsifying caller ID information—which can result in fines of up to $10,000 per violation or $1,000,000 for a single continuing act.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Telecommunications service providers

They must comply with new FCC regulations regarding the transmission of caller ID information.

Directly affected

Law enforcement agencies

They are granted specific exemptions from the prohibition on caller ID manipulation to conduct authorized investigative activities.

Directly affected

State Attorneys General

They are granted the authority to bring civil actions in federal court to enforce the law on behalf of their state's residents.

Key Facts

  • It is unlawful to knowingly transmit misleading or inaccurate caller ID information with the intent to defraud, cause harm, or wrongfully obtain value.
  • The FCC must prescribe implementing regulations within 6 months of the act's enactment.
  • Regulations must include exemptions for authorized law enforcement activities and court-ordered caller ID manipulation.
  • Civil forfeiture penalties are capped at $10,000 per violation, or 3 times that amount per day for continuing violations, up to a $1,000,000 maximum.
Show all 10 facts
  • Criminal fines for willful and knowing violations are set at up to $10,000 per violation or 3 times that amount per day for continuing violations.
  • State chief legal officers may bring civil actions in federal court on behalf of state residents to enforce the law.
  • The FCC has the right to intervene in any civil action brought by a state.
  • There is a 2-year statute of limitations for imposing forfeiture penalties.
  • The FCC must report to Congress within 6 months on whether additional legislation is needed for successor or replacement technologies.
  • The law does not restrict the ability of any person to block the transmission of their caller ID information.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this law stop all caller ID spoofing?
No. It prohibits spoofing only when done with the intent to defraud, cause harm, or wrongfully obtain value. It also includes specific exemptions for law enforcement and court-ordered activities.
Can I still block my own caller ID information?
Yes. The law explicitly states that nothing in the act prevents or restricts a person from blocking the transmission of their caller ID information.
Who can I contact if I am a victim of caller ID fraud?
The law allows state chief legal officers (such as an Attorney General) to bring civil actions on behalf of residents, and the FCC is the primary federal agency responsible for enforcement.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Became law.

Last action
Became Public Law No: 111-331.Dec 22, 2010

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Expansion of State Enforcement

The act explicitly empowers state-level officials to act as federal enforcers in district courts, a common mechanism for scaling consumer protection enforcement.

Connected Entities

111th Congress, Federal Communications Commission
Organization111th Congress“The legislative body that enacted the law.”Map →
OrganizationFederal Communications Commission“The agency responsible for prescribing regulations, enforcing penalties, and rep”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.congress.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record