NewsWLRN — South Florida NPR (Government & Politics)June 23, 2026Miami-Dade
Supreme Court Allows Exxon Mobil to Sue Cuban State-Owned Companies
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that Exxon Mobil can pursue lawsuits in U.S. courts against Cuban state-owned companies for property seized by the Cuban government over 65 years ago. This decision relies on Title III of the 1996 Helms-Burton Act, which allows Americans to sue entities profiting from confiscated property in Cuba.
Read the full story at WLRN — South Florida NPR (Government & Politics)Why It Matters
This ruling removes legal immunity for Cuban state-owned companies in U.S. courts, potentially exposing them to billions of dollars in claims from U.S. companies and individuals whose assets were seized after the Cuban revolution.
Key Facts
- The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that Exxon Mobil may sue Cuban state-owned companies in U.S. courts.
- The ruling is based on Title III of the 1996 Helms-Burton Act.
- The decision reverses a lower-court ruling that had granted sovereign immunity to Cuban state-owned companies.
- Exxon Mobil is seeking compensation for over 100 service stations and an oil refinery seized by the Cuban government.
- The U.S. Foreign Claims Settlement Commission valued Exxon Mobil's seized property at $71.6 million in 1969.
- With 6% annual interest since 1960, the value of the Exxon Mobil claim is estimated at over $1 billion today.
- Nearly 6,000 individuals and businesses hold claims against Cuba worth $1.9 billion, excluding interest.
- The Trump administration lifted the suspension of Title III in 2019, allowing these lawsuits to proceed.
- The ruling follows a similar decision last month regarding a company that operated docks in Havana.
Who's Mentioned
organizationExxon Mobil“The plaintiff seeking compensation for assets seized in Cuba.”personBrett Kavanaugh“Supreme Court Justice who wrote the majority opinion.”organizationU.S. Foreign Claims Settlement Commission“Department of Justice arm that valued the seized property.”personFidel Castro“Former leader of Cuba under whose government property was seized.”personElena Kagan“Supreme Court Justice who wrote the dissenting opinion.”organizationSupreme Court“The judicial body that issued the 6-3 ruling.”