POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Senate Hearing on Consumer Product Safety and Recalls

Original title: CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY AND THE RECALL PROCESS

Record date · January 1, 2016

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is the transcript of a 2015 Senate subcommittee hearing regarding the effectiveness and processes of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission () in managing product s. It includes testimony from CPSC officials, industry representatives, and safety advocates regarding how dangerous products are identified and removed from the market.

Why it matters

The hearing examines the regulatory framework that determines how and when consumer products are ed, directly impacting the safety standards and notification processes for goods sold to the public.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Consumers

The regulatory processes discussed determine the speed and effectiveness of product recalls, which impacts the availability of information regarding hazardous products.

Directly affected

Manufacturers and Retailers

These entities are subject to CPSC recall requirements and compliance standards discussed during the hearing.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on October 8, 2015, by the Senate Subcommittee on Consumer Protection, Product Safety, Insurance, and Data Security.
  • The primary subject was the evaluation of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission's (CPSC) recall process.
  • Testimony was provided by CPSC leadership, legal experts, and representatives from the manufacturing and retail sectors.
  • The hearing included a review of correspondence regarding product safety concerns dating back to 2014.
Show all 5 facts
  • The record includes written responses to follow-up questions from Senators directed at CPSC commissioners and industry witnesses.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was conducted to review how the Consumer Product Safety Commission manages the of dangerous products and to hear perspectives from regulators, businesses, and safety advocates.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included the Chairman and a Commissioner of the , representatives from the National Association of Manufacturers and the National Retail Federation, legal experts, and the Executive Director of Kids In Danger.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference90% confidence

Historical Oversight

The hearing incorporates letters from 2014, indicating that the subcommittee was tracking specific safety concerns for over a year prior to the hearing date.

Connected Entities

Elliot F. Kaye, National Retail Federation, National Association of Manufacturers and 4 more
PersonElliot F. Kaye“Chairman of the Consumer Product Safety Commission”Map →
OrganizationNational Retail Federation“Retail industry trade group represented at the hearing”Map →
OrganizationNational Association of Manufacturers“Industry trade group represented at the hearing”Map →
PersonJerry Moran“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Consumer Protection, Product Safety, Insurance, ”Map →
OrganizationConsumer Product Safety Commission“Federal agency responsible for product safety”Map →
PersonAnn Marie Buerkle“Commissioner of the Consumer Product Safety Commission”Map →
OrganizationKids In Danger“Non-profit organization focused on child safety”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record