POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Alabama HB 325 requires businesses to disclose AI chatbots in commercial transactions

Original title: AI chatbots; unfair or deceptive trade practice for failing to notify consumer about AI chatbot; private right of action and enforcement provided for

Last action · January 22, 2026: Pending Committee Action in House of OriginSponsor: Parker Moore

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Businesses using AI chatbots in commercial transactions must notify consumers at the start and at regular intervals that they are communicating with a computer rather than a human. Failing to provide this disclosure constitutes an . The measure goes into effect on October 1, 2026.

Why it matters

Consumers gain the legal right to sue companies for statutory damages up to $1,000 per violation and when engaging with undisclosed automated systems, while the state may pursue civil penalties up to $5,000,000.

Background
  • State legislatures across the country are increasingly introducing bills to regulate the use of artificial intelligence and require clear disclosure when consumers interact with automated customer service bots. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Consumers

Consumers receive mandatory disclosures during chatbot interactions and gain the right to file civil suits and seek statutory damages for noncompliance.

Directly affected

Commercial entities using AI chatbots

Businesses must implement verbal or written notices at the start of and during chatbot interactions or face civil penalties and private lawsuits.

Directly affected

Attorney General

The Attorney General is empowered to investigate, enjoin violations, and seek civil penalties of up to $5,000,000 against violators.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What triggers the disclosure requirement under this bill?
Any commercial transaction or trade practice where a person interacts with a consumer through an AI chatbot in textual or aural conversation under circumstances where the consumer might reasonably believe they are engaging with a human.
What penalties can businesses face for failing to disclose an AI chatbot?
Violations are treated as s, exposing the business to individual civil suits from consumers seeking and up to $1,000 per violation in statutory damages, class action damages capped at $10,000,000, and Attorney General enforcement actions seeking civil penalties up to $5,000,000.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Jan 22, 2026HouseCommittee
    Pending Committee Action in House of Origin
  2. Jan 22, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read for the first time and referred to the House Committee on Judiciary

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Hassell, Parker Moore, Attorney General and 6 more
PersonHassell“Co-sponsor of House Bill 325”Map →
PersonParker Moore“Primary sponsor of House Bill 325”Map →
OrganizationAttorney General“Authorized to bring suit to enforce the act and seek civil penalties”Map →
PersonChestnut“Co-sponsor of House Bill 325”Map →
PersonShaw“Co-sponsor of House Bill 325”Map →
PersonDuBose“Co-sponsor of House Bill 325”Map →
PersonGray“Co-sponsor of House Bill 325”Map →
PersonBedsole“Co-sponsor of House Bill 325”Map →
PersonRobbins“Co-sponsor of House Bill 325”Map →

Sources

Open source document

alison.legislature.state.al.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy45
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz60
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record