POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Senate Hearing on the 2016 Veterans Affairs Budget

Original title: THE FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET FOR VETERANS PROGRAMS

Record date · January 1, 2016

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is the transcript of a February 2015 Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs hearing regarding the proposed federal budget for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for 2016. The committee heard testimony from the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and representatives from various .

Why it matters

The hearing established the legislative record for the 2016 funding levels for veterans' healthcare, benefits, and memorial services, which directly impacts the resources available to millions of U.S. veterans.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

U.S. Veterans

The budget discussed determines the funding levels for healthcare, disability benefits, and memorial services provided to veterans.

Directly affected

Department of Veterans Affairs

The agency is responsible for implementing the budget and managing the programs discussed in the hearing.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on February 26, 2015, in the Russell Senate Office Building.
  • The session focused on the fiscal year 2016 budget request for the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
  • Testimony was provided by VA Secretary Robert A. McDonald and his senior staff, including the Under Secretaries for Health, Benefits, and Memorial Affairs.
  • Representatives from major veterans service organizations, including the American Legion and Vietnam Veterans of America, provided independent budget perspectives.
Show all 6 facts
  • The committee implemented a new rule for the hearing to limit opening statements to the Chairman and Ranking Member to allow more time for witness testimony.
  • The hearing record includes extensive post-hearing responses to questions submitted by committee members to the VA.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The purpose was to review the proposed 2016 budget for the Department of Veterans Affairs and hear feedback from both VA leadership and veterans advocacy groups.
Who testified at the hearing?
The hearing featured testimony from VA Secretary Robert A. McDonald, his senior leadership team, and representatives from several .

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Procedural Change in Hearing Format

The committee explicitly changed its rules for this hearing to limit opening statements to the Chairman and Ranking Member to prioritize witness testimony.

Connected Entities

Johnny Isakson, Robert A. McDonald, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and 4 more
PersonJohnny Isakson“Chairman of the Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs”Map →
PersonRobert A. McDonald“Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs”Map →
OrganizationU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs“The federal department whose budget was under review”Map →
OrganizationVeterans of Foreign Wars of the United States“Veterans service organization providing testimony”Map →
OrganizationDisabled American Veterans“Veterans service organization providing testimony”Map →
PersonRichard Blumenthal“Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs”Map →
OrganizationParalyzed Veterans of America“Veterans service organization providing testimony”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance80
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record