The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Nevada bill requires large and resort hotels to provide daily room cleaning and safety inspections
Last action · April 12, 2025: (Pursuant to Joint Standing Rule No. 14.3.1, no further action allowed.)Sponsor: Lori Rogich
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Senator Lori Rogich introduced Senate Bill 360, which mandates that s and hotels with more than 200 rooms in counties with a population of 100,000 or more provide daily room cleaning and conduct bi-daily safety inspections of guest rooms by room attendants, effective October 1, 2025. The measure also prohibits hotel operators from retaliating against employees who report violations or participate in proceedings.
Large hotel and resort operators in Clark and Washoe counties face new operational mandates, potential administrative fines up to $1,000 per violation, and potential license suspension or civil lawsuits for non-compliance, while room attendants receive explicit protections to request security presence during inspections.
- State Board of Health regulations govern general sanitation and sanitary practices across public accommodations in Nevada under existing statutory authority. context
- Clark and Washoe counties are Nevada's two most populous counties, surpassing the 100,000 population threshold specified in the bill. context
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Hotel operators
Hotel operators must ensure daily room cleaning and bi-daily safety inspections in qualifying facilities, maintain opt-out records, and face potential fines, license reviews, and civil liability for non-compliance.
Room attendants and hotel employees
Room attendants must conduct visual safety inspections with the right to request security presence, while all hotel employees gain protections against retaliation for reporting violations or participating in proceedings.
Hotel guests
Guests receive mandatory daily cleaning and bi-daily safety inspections unless they explicitly opt out or display privacy markers.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which hotels are required to provide daily room cleaning and safety inspections?
Can a hotel guest decline daily room cleaning?
What protections are given to room attendants performing safety inspections?
What penalties can a hotel face for violating these rules?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.
Procedural history
3 actions- Apr 12, 2025(Pursuant to Joint Standing Rule No. 14.3.1, no further action allowed.)
- Mar 18, 2025CommitteeFrom printer. To committee.
- Mar 17, 2025IntroducedRead first time. Referred to Committee on Health and Human Services. To printer.
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Establishment of Statewide Hotel Safety and Cleaning Mandates
The bill shifts regulatory oversight by requiring mandatory daily room cleaning and bi-daily visual safety checks in larger hotels within high-population counties, accompanied by statutory employee anti-retaliation provisions.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.leg.state.nv.us
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
- Controversy65Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz50Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
