POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Recently Updated

New Jersey Requires Attorney General to Study Law Enforcement Facial Recognition Use and Propose Statewide Policy

Original title: Requires AG to study law enforcement use of facial recognition technology and issue report with recommendations for Statewide policy.

Last action · October 19, 2026: Reported out of Assembly Committee, 2nd ReadingSponsors: Al Abdelaziz and 2 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

New Jersey requires the Attorney General to study law enforcement use of and issue a report with policy recommendations within six months of taking effect.

Why it matters

Establishes a formal timeline and mandate for evaluating police surveillance capabilities across state and local agencies, directly shaping future statewide rules on digital identification tools.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

State law enforcement agencies

Subject to a statewide review of their facial recognition technology use and potential future statewide policies.

Directly affected

Local law enforcement agencies

Subject to evaluation regarding their current use of facial recognition for police reports and future statewide rules.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is required to conduct the study on facial recognition technology?
The Attorney General is required to conduct the study.
When is the report due?
The report must be issued within six months of the effective date of the act.
Who will receive the findings and recommendations?
The report will be submitted to the Governor and the Legislature.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Oct 19, 2026House
    Reported out of Assembly Committee, 2nd Reading
  2. Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced, Referred to Assembly Public Safety and Preparedness Committee

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Attorney General, Legislature, New Jersey and 1 more
OrganizationAttorney General“Required to study facial recognition use and issue a report.”Map →
OrganizationLegislature“Receives the report from the Attorney General.”Map →
locationNew Jersey“The state jurisdiction implementing the legislation.”Map →
PersonGovernor“Receives the report from the Attorney General.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

njleg.state.nj.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance50
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz35
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record