POLISCOPE
Back to feed
NewsWPLG Local 10 – Main FeedOctober 26, 2026Miami-Dade County

9th Circuit Appellate Judges Question Justice Department Request to Set Aside California Mail Ballots

Photo: WPLG Local 10 – Main Feed

A federal appeals court panel questioned the timing and authority of a Justice Department lawsuit demanding that California set aside 20,000 mail ballots from voters flagged as potential noncitizens. The Trump administration argues that counting these ballots causes irreparable harm, while state and county attorneys contend the federal list is unreliable and would disenfranchise eligible voters.

Read the full story at WPLG Local 10 – Main Feed

Why It Matters

The outcome of the litigation could affect how thousands of mail ballots are handled in California elections and whether federal authorities can compel states to segregate ballots based on citizenship reviews.

Key Facts

  • A panel of 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judges questioned a Justice Department lawsuit demanding California set aside 20,000 mail ballots flagged as potential noncitizens.
  • The Justice Department asked a federal judge to require California to withhold counting the flagged ballots until immigration status could be verified.
  • Justice Department attorney Matthew Donnelly argued that allowing potentially noncitizen votes causes irreparable and irreversible harm.
  • Judge Mark Bennett questioned whether the appellate court has jurisdiction to hear the case before a lower court ruling.
  • Judge Gabriel Sanchez raised concerns that the federal government might be violating the Tenth Amendment by commandeering state enforcement of federal law.
  • Attorney Seth Waxman stated that segregating the ballots based on the administration's list would effectively disenfranchise thousands of eligible voters.
  • Los Angeles County staff reviewed a sample of 200 records from the administration's list and found canceled registrations, inactive registrations, and individuals born in the United States.
  • Attorney Sam Siegel argued that the federal government provided no credible evidence and that noncitizen voting is exceptionally rare.

Who's Mentioned