POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

West Virginia Bill HB 5192 bases school safety funding calculations on the highest of recent enrollment or three-year averages

Original title: School funding calculations should be the last three-year running average or the current enrollment, whichever is highest

Last action · February 4, 2026: To House EducationSponsors: Ray Canterbury and 2 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

West Virginia House Bill 5192 establishes that school access safety fund allocations must calculate student enrollment using either the current enrollment or the last three-year , whichever is higher. The measure applies to county boards of education seeking funding disbursements for school safety projects.

Why it matters

County boards of education rely on enrollment-based formulas to determine their share of state safety funding, meaning districts with declining student populations could secure higher allocations under a three-year average calculation.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

county board of education

County boards are subject to new calculation rules for enrollment numbers and must meet contribution, planning, and spending deadlines to receive safety funds.

Directly affected

public schools

Public school enrollment figures dictate the per-pupil amount and overall funding allocations received by each county.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the bill determine enrollment for school safety funding calculations?
Calculations are based on either the last three-year of enrollment or the current enrollment, whichever is highest.
What local financial contribution is required from county boards to receive safety funds?
County boards must contribute local funds derived from bonding, special levies, or other sources equal to at least fifteen percent of the funds available to them, unless they obtain a financial hardship waiver.
What happens if a county board fails to spend disbursed safety funds within one year?
The county board forfeits any unspent funds, and they are returned to the School Access Safety Fund, though the authority may authorize an extension of up to an additional six months.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Feb 4, 2026HouseCommittee
    To House Education
  2. Feb 4, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced in House
  3. Feb 4, 2026HouseCommittee
    To Education then Finance
  4. Feb 4, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Filed for introduction

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

House Education, School Access Safety Fund
OrganizationHouse Education“Committee assigned to review the bill”Map →
OrganizationSchool Access Safety Fund“Fund used for allocation and disbursement of school safety funds”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.wvlegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 45)
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record