POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Congressional Hearing on U.S. Strategy in Afghanistan

Original title: ASSESSING THE PRESIDENT'S STRATEGY IN AFGHANISTAN

Record date · January 1, 2016

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is a transcript of a 2015 House hearing held to evaluate the U.S. military and security strategy in Afghanistan. Lawmakers and expert witnesses discussed the impact of the Taliban's resurgence, the effectiveness of Afghan security forces, and the President's decision to adjust troop withdrawal timelines.

Why it matters

The hearing examines the federal government's military commitment and national security policy in Afghanistan, which directly impacts the deployment of U.S. service members and the allocation of defense resources.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

U.S. Military Personnel

The strategy discussed determines the number of troops deployed to and remaining in Afghanistan.

Directly affected

Afghan Security Forces

The effectiveness and support of these forces are central to the U.S. strategy discussed in the hearing.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on December 2, 2015, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
  • The Department of State issued a warning regarding a possible imminent attack in Kabul shortly before the hearing.
  • President Obama announced a halt to the withdrawal of American forces from Afghanistan following the Taliban's seizure of Kunduz.
  • The hearing included testimony from experts representing the American Enterprise Institute, the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and the United States Institute of Peace.
Show all 5 facts
  • The subcommittee discussed the performance of Afghan security forces in regaining control of Kunduz from the Taliban.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to assess the President's strategy in Afghanistan, specifically regarding troop withdrawal and the security situation on the ground.
Who provided expert testimony at the hearing?
Testimony was provided by Frederick W. Kagan (American Enterprise Institute), David S. Sedney (Center for Strategic and International Studies), and Andrew Wilder (United States Institute of Peace).

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Shift in Withdrawal Strategy

The document highlights a direct link between the Taliban's capture of Kunduz and the President's decision to halt troop withdrawals.

Connected Entities

David S. Sedney, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Andrew Wilder and 3 more
PersonDavid S. Sedney“Witness, Center for Strategic and International Studies”Map →
PersonIleana Ros-Lehtinen“Chairman of the Subcommittee on the Middle East and North Africa”Map →
PersonAndrew Wilder“Witness, United States Institute of Peace”Map →
PersonBarack Obama“President of the United States at the time of the hearing”Map →
OrganizationSubcommittee on the Middle East and North Africa“House Foreign Affairs subcommittee conducting the hearing”Map →
PersonFrederick W. Kagan“Witness, American Enterprise Institute”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record