The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Texas creates groundwater research fund administered by the Water Development Board
Last action · April 16, 2025: Referred to Water, Agriculture, & Rural AffairsSponsors: Cody Harris and 10 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Texas establishes the groundwater science, research, and innovation fund to provide grants to s for local research, data collection, modeling, and water conservation projects, effective September 1, 2025.
s across Texas gain access to state grant funding for research, modeling, and conservation projects, with 35 percent of distributed money specifically earmarked for smaller districts meeting strict population and revenue thresholds.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
groundwater conservation districts
Groundwater conservation districts become eligible to apply for and receive state financial assistance grants for research, data collection, and conservation projects.
institutions of higher education
Institutions partnering with districts on grant-funded projects are exempt from the district matching funds requirement.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is eligible to receive grants from the new fund?
Are smaller districts guaranteed a specific portion of the funding?
Do grant recipients have to provide matching funds?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the House · in Senate committee.
Procedural history
25 actions- Apr 16, 2025SenateCommitteeReferred to Water, Agriculture, & Rural Affairs
- Apr 16, 2025SenateIntroducedRead first time
- Apr 14, 2025SenateReceived from the House
- Apr 10, 2025HouseReported engrossed
- Apr 10, 2025HouseStatement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
- Apr 10, 2025HouseFloorRecord vote (RV#106)
Show 19 earlier actions
- Apr 10, 2025HouseFloorPassed as amended
- Apr 10, 2025HouseAmended (1-Harris)
- Apr 10, 2025HouseFloorRead 3rd time
- Apr 9, 2025HouseStatement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
- Apr 9, 2025HouseFloorRecord vote (RV#99)
- Apr 9, 2025HouseFloorPassed to engrossment
- Apr 9, 2025HouseFloorRead 2nd time
- Apr 9, 2025HousePlaced on General State Calendar
- Apr 1, 2025HouseConsidered in Calendars
- Mar 25, 2025HouseCommittee report sent to Calendars
- Mar 25, 2025HouseCommittee report distributed
- Mar 25, 2025HouseComte report filed with Committee Coordinator
- Mar 19, 2025HouseCommitteeReported favorably w/o amendment(s)
- Mar 19, 2025HouseTestimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
- Mar 19, 2025HouseConsidered in public hearing
- Mar 19, 2025HouseScheduled for public hearing on . . .
- Mar 11, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to Natural Resources
- Mar 11, 2025HouseIntroducedRead first time
- Nov 19, 2024HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Voting Record
HB 1400 , as amended, was passed
Total
144
- Yes
- 129
- No
- 13
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 1
- Abstain
- 0
- Other positions
- 1
How they voted (144)
120 more members
Show 1 earlier roll call
HB 1400 was passed to engrossment
Total
144
- Yes
- 131
- No
- 10
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 2
- Abstain
- 0
- Other positions
- 1
How they voted (144)
120 more members
Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
capitol.texas.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
- Controversy15Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz25Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
