POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Kentucky Bill Prohibits Firing Crime-Victim Employees for Attending Legal Proceedings and Mandates Strict Employer Confidentiality

Original title: AN ACT relating to leave from employment.

Last action · January 13, 2026: to Economic Development & Workforce Investment (H)Sponsors: Lindsey Burke and 2 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Kentucky HB 29 prohibits employers from discharging, discriminating, or retaliating against employees who are crime victims and take leave to attend court or legal proceedings associated with the prosecution of the crime. Employees must provide reasonable notice or submit documentation within two business days after returning to work, and employers must maintain the strict confidentiality of all leave-related communications and records.

Why it matters

Crime-victim employees gain legal protection from workplace retaliation and job loss while participating in criminal justice proceedings, while employers face civil penalties ranging from $100 to $1,000 per offense, private lawsuits for actual and reputational damages, and court-ordered for violations.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Crime-victim employees

Employees who are crime victims gain legal protection from discharge or retaliation when taking leave to attend legal proceedings, alongside mandatory record confidentiality.

Directly affected

Kentucky employers

Employers are mandated to grant leave upon proper notice, keep leave records strictly confidential, and face civil penalties and private lawsuits for violations.

Directly affected

Education and Labor Cabinet

The cabinet is charged with imposing civil penalties for violations of the chapter provisions.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What notice must an employee give before taking leave for a court proceeding?
An employee must provide reasonable notice of intent to take leave by giving the employer a copy of the scheduled hearing, conference, or meeting notice from the court or agency. If prior notice is impracticable, documentation must be provided within two business days after returning to work.
Can an employer require an employee to use paid sick or vacation time for this leave?
Yes. An employee may elect to use, or an employer may require the use of, accrued vacation time, personal leave time, compensatory time, or sick leave time.
What penalties do employers face for violating these leave rules?
Employers face civil penalties of $100 to $1,000 per offense enforced by the Education and Labor Cabinet, potential private lawsuits for actual and reputational damages, and court-ordered remedies including reemployment, , court costs, and attorney's fees.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Jan 13, 2026HouseCommittee
    to Economic Development & Workforce Investment (H)
  2. Jan 6, 2026HouseIntroduced
    introduced in House to Committee on Committees (H)

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expansion of Crime Victim Workplace Protections

The bill integrates specific anti-retaliation and confidentiality protections directly into existing wage and labor statutes enforced by the Education and Labor Cabinet.

Connected Entities

General Assembly, Education and Labor Cabinet
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Legislative body enacting the bill”Map →
OrganizationEducation and Labor Cabinet“Cabinet responsible for imposing civil penalties under KRS 337.990”Map →

Sources

Open source document

apps.legislature.ky.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 70)
  • Controversy35
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record