POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Pennsylvania House Bill 490 Establishes Qualified Privilege for Journalists' Nonconfidential Sources and Materials

Original title: An Act amending Titles 2 (Administrative Law and Procedure) and 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in depositions and witnesses, further providing for confidential communications to news reporters; and making editorial changes.

Last action · February 27, 2026: Referred to JUDICIARY, Feb. 27, 2026Sponsors: Ben Waxman and 17 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

House Bill 490 establishes a allowing journalists, editors, and media workers to refuse disclosure of nonconfidential sources and materials in legal and administrative proceedings. The measure requires parties seeking disclosure to demonstrate that information is unavailable elsewhere, critical to the case, and pursued after exhausting other avenues. Additionally, the bill protects media employers and supervisors, bars fines or imprisonment for refusing privileged disclosures, and makes information obtained in violation of the statute inadmissible before any agency, taking effect in 60 days.

Why it matters

News reporters, editors, and broadcasting staff gain explicit legal protection for unpublished notes, recordings, and nonconfidential contacts unless a court issues a specific order following a formal hearing and evidentiary showing.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

News reporters

Media personnel gain a statutory qualified privilege protecting nonconfidential sources and materials, alongside protections from fines or imprisonment for refusal to disclose.

Directly affected

Parties to legal proceedings

Litigants seeking information from media sources must meet specific statutory criteria and demonstrate that information is unavailable elsewhere before a court can order disclosure.

Directly affected

Interpreters

Interpreters for persons who are deaf or have limited English proficiency have their confidentiality statutes updated to cross-reference reporter communication protections.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What protection does House Bill 490 offer to journalists regarding nonconfidential information?
The bill grants individuals engaged in news gathering for newspapers, press associations, broadcasters, and magazines a to refuse to disclose nonconfidential sources and materials.
Under what conditions can a court order a reporter to disclose nonconfidential information?
A court may order disclosure only if a party demonstrates that they tried to obtain the information elsewhere, that the information is only accessible through media personnel, and that the information is critical to the case, followed by clear and specific findings after a hearing.
Can a journalist be fined or imprisoned for refusing to disclose privileged information under this bill?
No, the bill explicitly prohibits the imposition of any fine or imprisonment against a person for refusing to disclose information privileged by the provisions of the section.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

11 actions
  1. Feb 27, 2026SenateCommittee
    Referred to JUDICIARY, Feb. 27, 2026
  2. Feb 27, 2026Senate
    In the Senate
  3. Feb 4, 2026HouseFloor
    Third consideration and final passage, Feb. 4, 2026 (100-98)
  4. Feb 4, 2026HouseCommittee
    Re-reported as committed, Feb. 4, 2026
  5. Feb 3, 2026House
    Re-committed to APPROPRIATIONS, Feb. 3, 2026
  6. Feb 3, 2026HouseFloor
    Second consideration, Feb. 3, 2026
Show 5 earlier actions
  1. Feb 2, 2026House
    Removed from table, Feb. 2, 2026
  2. Nov 17, 2025House
    Laid on the table, Nov. 17, 2025
  3. Nov 17, 2025HouseIntroduced
    First consideration, Nov. 17, 2025
  4. Nov 17, 2025HouseCommittee
    Reported as committed, Nov. 17, 2025
  5. Feb 5, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to JUDICIARY, Feb. 5, 2025

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expansion of Press Protections

The legislation extends existing protections beyond confidential source identities to encompass nonconfidential sources and materials under a qualified privilege framework.

Connected Entities

Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes
OrganizationPennsylvania Consolidated Statutes“Statutory compilation amended by the bill”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.palegis.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record