POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Review of the 2016 Department of Energy Budget Request

Original title: ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016

January 1, 2015

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing sets the stage for the upcoming bill, which will determine funding levels for national laboratories, energy research, and nuclear security programs for the 2016 fiscal year.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Department of Energy

The agency's funding levels and operational priorities for the 2016 fiscal year are being determined.

National Laboratories

The labs are subject to potential funding changes based on the subcommittee's budget decisions.

Wind energy producers

The committee is evaluating the continuation of federal subsidies that currently support wind energy production.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development held a hearing to review the Department of Energy's proposed $30.5 billion budget for fiscal year 2016. The committee discussed funding priorities, including basic energy research, supercomputing, and the management of nuclear waste.

Key Facts

  • The Department of Energy requested a budget of $30.5 billion for fiscal year 2016.
  • The requested budget represents a $2.5 billion increase over the previous year's appropriation.
  • The President's total discretionary budget request exceeds Budget Control Act spending caps by $74 billion.
  • The subcommittee's total available increase for both defense and non-defense spending under the Budget Control Act is approximately $3 billion.
  • The Department of Energy manages 17 national laboratories, 10 of which are overseen by the Office of Science.
  • ARPA-E has received approximately $1 billion in appropriations since 2009, funding over 400 projects.
  • The U.S. aims to regain the world's fastest supercomputer by 2017.
  • The wind energy subsidy costs taxpayers approximately $6 billion annually.
  • The subcommittee is prioritizing four areas: basic energy research, reducing spending on mature technologies, advanced scientific computing, and nuclear waste management.

Why It Matters

The hearing sets the stage for the upcoming bill, which will determine funding levels for national laboratories, energy research, and nuclear security programs for the 2016 fiscal year.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the total budget requested for the Department of Energy in 2016?
The Department of Energy requested $30.5 billion for fiscal year 2016.
What are the four main priorities identified by the subcommittee chairman?
The priorities are doubling basic energy research, reducing spending on mature technologies, leading in advanced scientific computing, and solving the nuclear waste stalemate.
What is ARPA-E?
ARPA-E is a program created under the America COMPETES Act that funds high-risk, high-reward energy research projects.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Shift in Subsidy Philosophy

The chairman explicitly signaled a move to end subsidies for 'mature' technologies like wind, citing them as market-distorting.

Connected Entities

personErnest J. MonizSecretary of the Department of EnergyMap →
personFranklin OrrUnder Secretary for Science and EnergyMap →
organizationDepartment of EnergyThe federal agency whose budget is under reviewMap →
personLamar AlexanderChairman of the Subcommittee on Energy and Water DevelopmentMap →
personDianne FeinsteinSenator and subcommittee memberMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance80
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record