POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Delaware General Assembly Establishes Crime Victim-Advocate Privilege

Original title: AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 10 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO EVIDENCE AND WITNESSES.

Last action · September 14, 2026: Signed by GovernorSponsors: Krista Griffith and 16 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Victims of crime are now allowed to keep confidential communications with their victim advocates private or waive the using a signed waiver.

Why it matters

Evidentiary rules in legal proceedings now shield victim-advocate communications from disclosure, with specific legal exceptions for child abuse reporting, intended violent crimes, and criminal defense requests.

Background
  • House Bill 213 amends Title 10 of the Delaware Code concerning evidence and witnesses to introduce statutory protections for victim communications. context

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

crime victims

Victims gain a legal privilege protecting their confidential communications with victim advocates from disclosure.

Directly affected

victim advocates

Advocates are subject to statutory definitions requiring 20 hours of training and gain the authority to claim confidentiality on behalf of victims.

Directly affected

defendants in criminal cases

Defendants are subject to new legal hurdles when seeking access to victim-advocate communications, subject to specific statutory exceptions.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What training is required to be recognized as a victim advocate under this law?
A victim advocate must be an employee of a victim services agency or a formal volunteer supervised by one, and must have completed a minimum of 20 hours of advocacy training.
Can a criminal defendant ever access these confidential communications?
Yes, the Act adds a defined process and criteria allowing a defendant in a criminal case to overcome the under specific circumstances.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

6 actions
  1. Sep 14, 2026Office of the GovernorEnrolled
    Signed by Governor
  2. Jun 23, 2026SenateFloor
    Passed By Senate. Votes: 21 YES
  3. May 6, 2026SenateCommittee
    Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in Senate with 4 On Its Merits
  4. Mar 17, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Assigned to Judiciary Committee in Senate
  5. Mar 17, 2026HouseFloor
    Passed By House. Votes: 39 YES 2 ABSENT
  6. Mar 12, 2026HouseIntroduced
    was introduced and adopted in lieu of HB 213

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Voting Record

Show 1 earlier roll call
Motion succeededHouse3/17/2026Open StatesOfficial roll call ↗

SM

Total

39

Yes
39
No
0
Present
0
Not voting
0
Abstain
0

How they voted (39)

15 more members

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Expansion of Evidentiary Privileges

The measure aligns victim-advocate communications with established professional secrecy rules like the therapist-client privilege.

Connected Entities

Department of Justice, Burns v. State
OrganizationDepartment of Justice“Explicitly excluded from the definition of a victim services agency”Map →
otherBurns v. State“Judicial precedent referenced for therapist-client privilege exception”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legis.delaware.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record