Congressional Hearing on Healthcare Costs and Patient Care
January 1, 2017
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This hearing served as a formal record of expert testimony and stakeholder positions regarding federal healthcare policy and insurance market regulations, which informs future legislative drafting.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Health insurance policyholders
The hearing discussed regulations and market structures that influence insurance premiums and coverage access.
Labor unions (AFL-CIO, AFSCME)
These organizations submitted formal statements to the committee regarding their positions on healthcare policy.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on June 10, 2016, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
- The session was titled 'Advancing Patient Solutions for Lower Costs and Better Care'.
- Witnesses included representatives from the Galen Institute, American Action Forum, and the Commonwealth Fund.
- Statements were submitted for the record by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO, AARP, and the Association of Mature American Citizens.
- The committee received research articles regarding the impact of age-based insurance premium limits and the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
- The hearing was conducted by the Subcommittee on Health of the Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
Why It Matters
This hearing served as a formal record of expert testimony and stakeholder positions regarding federal healthcare policy and insurance market regulations, which informs future legislative drafting.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Historical Policy Debate
The hearing highlights the ongoing legislative focus on the ACA's age-rating bands, with evidence submitted from as early as 2013.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance40How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy30Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools