The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Senate Hearing on the 2016 Department of Commerce Budget Request
Record date · January 1, 2015
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
The Senate Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies met to review the Department of Commerce's proposed $9.8 billion budget for fiscal year 2016. Chairman Richard Shelby expressed concerns regarding the 16% spending increase, the management of the 2020 Census, potential gaps in weather satellite data, and the funding of new manufacturing initiatives.
The hearing outlines the proposed $1.3 billion increase in federal spending for the Department of Commerce, which impacts funding for the 2020 Census, weather forecasting infrastructure, and economic development programs for local communities.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Taxpayers
Taxpayers are the source of the $9.8 billion budget request and are affected by the allocation of funds toward new initiatives versus core agency functions.
NOAA
The agency is responsible for managing weather satellite programs and faces scrutiny regarding potential data gaps.
Local Businesses
Businesses may be affected by the Department's economic development programs and manufacturing initiatives.
Key Facts
- The Department of Commerce requested a total budget of $9.8 billion for fiscal year 2016.
- The 2016 request represents a $1.3 billion (16%) increase over the 2015 enacted budget of $8.5 billion.
- The budget includes funding for the 2020 Decennial Census and next-generation weather satellites.
- Polar orbiting satellites provide 85% of the data used in NOAA's weather prediction models.
Show all 8 facts
- The GAO predicts a potential gap in polar satellite data ranging from 17 to 53 months, while NOAA and NASA estimate a 3-month gap.
- The Department requested $380 million as an initial down payment for a new polar satellite program following the Joint Polar Satellite System.
- The administration proposed $150 million in discretionary funding for 2016 to establish two new manufacturing and innovation institutes.
- The administration proposed $1.9 billion in mandatory spending for 2017 to fund manufacturing institutes, which currently lacks authorization.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is there concern about the 2020 Census?
What is the issue with weather satellites?
What are the proposed manufacturing institutes?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceLobbying Activity
AARP
2026
“P.L. 119-21, One Big Beautiful Bill Act H.R. 8867, Planning for Long-term Aging Needs (PLAN) Act H.R. 5861, Legacy Act of 2025 H.R. 9393, the Lower Costs, More Transparency Act. H.R. 9396, the Prior Authorization Accountability Act. S. 4916, the Aging with Artificial Intelligence Act. H.R. 8100, Safe Staffing Saves Lives Act. S. 3886, Nurses Belong in Nursing Homes Act. H.R. 6766/S. 3492, the Essential Caregivers Act of 2025. H.R. 7966/S. 4118, Hospice Care Accountability, Reform, and Enforcement (Hospice CARE) Act. S. 2120, the Older Americans Act Reauthorization Act of 2025 H.R. 5575, the Firefighters Assisting Seniors to Emergency Response (FASTER) Act of 2025. H.R. 3954/S. 4641, Improving Access to Medicare Coverage Act. H.R.5554/S.2831, Stand Strong for Medicare Act. S. 3439/H.R. 6735, Connecting Caregivers to Medicare Act and efforts related to the bill S. 1227/H.R. 2491, Alleviating Barriers for Caregivers Act S. 668/H.R. 3183, Supporting Access to Falls Education and Prevention and Strengthening Training Efforts and Promoting Safety Initiatives (SAFE STEPS) for Veterans Act of 2025 CMS-1851-P, Hospice Proposed rule. CMS-1843-P, Skilled Nursing Facility Proposed rule. CMS-1844-P, Home Health Proposed rule. No bill number. Health care transparency. No bill number. Discussed use of artificial intelligence and health data technology. No bill number. Discussed health-related policies and activities around the fall respiratory virus season. No bill number. Discussed health insurance affordability proposals. No bill number. Discussed Nursing Home staffing standards, safety, and quality. No bill number. Discussed Nursing home transparency and ownership requirements. No bill number. Discussed home health, hospice, and long-term care. No bill number. Discussed falls prevention. No bill number. Discussed social isolation. No bill number. Discussed HUD Assisted Living Requirements No bill number. Discussed family caregiving. No bill number. Discussed AARP paper on Medicare Caregiver Training Services. No bill number. Discussed Medicaid community engagement interim final rule, including the family caregiver exemption. No bill number. Discussed the paid direct care workforce in long-term care. No bill number. Discussed the unaffordability of long-term care. No bill number. Discussed Money Follows the Person Rebalancing Demonstration Program and Medicaid HCBS spousal impoverishment protections. No bill number. Discussed Medicaid fraud and family caregivers, Medicaid self-direction programs. No bill number. Discussed sandwich generation family caregiver hearing and submitted a statement for the record discussing family caregivers and sandwich generation caregivers, programs that support them, AARP caregiving resources, and federal policies to support sandwich generation caregivers and caregivers more broadly. No bill number. Discussed long-term care. No bill number. CMS-2453-NC; Medicaid Program; 2028 Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services Quality Measure Set Submitted comments No bill number. Discussed expanding access to home care. No bill number. Discussed the increasing cost of home care No bill number. Discussed HSA use for telehealth chronic care management services/subscriptions. No bill number. Discussed artificial intelligence and technology”
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Shift toward mandatory spending for manufacturing
The administration is attempting to move funding for manufacturing institutes from discretionary to mandatory spending, which the committee notes has not yet been authorized.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
