The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Approval of Road Frontage Waiver for 1991 Faye Road
Record date · August 26, 2025
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
The City Council has approved a request to reduce the minimum required from 160 feet to 120 feet for two lots located at 1991 Faye Road. This waiver allows the property owner to proceed with development plans that do not meet standard zoning requirements.
This ordinance changes the land-use requirements for a specific property ( 110914-0000), allowing the owner to subdivide or develop the land with less street access than typically required by city code.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Brian Johnson
The applicant is granted permission to develop the specified lots with reduced road frontage requirements.
District 2 Residents
Residents in the vicinity of Faye Road may see changes to the density or layout of the property at 1991 Faye Road.
Key Facts
- The City Council approved a waiver for minimum road frontage requirements (Application WRF-25-6).
- The requirement was reduced from 160 feet to 120 feet.
- The waiver applies to two lots located at 1991 Faye Road (R.E. # 110914-0000).
- The property is zoned as RR-Acre.
Show all 8 facts
- The Land Use and Zoning (LUZ) committee approved the measure 6-0 on August 19, 2025.
- The City Council approved the ordinance 17-0 on August 26, 2025.
- The ordinance was introduced on June 24, 2025.
- Public hearings were held on August 5, 2025, and August 19, 2025.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does a road frontage waiver mean?
Does this affect my property taxes or zoning?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Unanimous Approval
The ordinance received unanimous support from both the LUZ committee and the full City Council, suggesting the request was non-contentious.
Sources
webapi.legistar.com
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy5Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
