POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

House Subcommittee Hearing on Military Personnel Posture

Original title: HEARING ON NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024 AND OVERSIGHT OF PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED PROGRAMS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED EIGHTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION

Record date · January 1, 2024

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

The House Armed Services Subcommittee on Military Personnel held a hearing on March 29, 2023, to review the current state of military personnel policies. The session featured testimony from personnel chiefs across all branches of the U.S. Armed Forces regarding recruitment, retention, and force management challenges.

Why it matters

This hearing sets the oversight foundation for the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2024, which will determine military personnel policies, benefits, and recruitment strategies for the coming year.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Military Personnel

Active-duty service members are subject to the policies, benefits, and career development programs discussed and potentially modified by the committee.

Directly affected

Department of Defense

The agency is responsible for implementing the personnel policies and recruitment strategies overseen by the subcommittee.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was the first time since 2019 that service personnel chiefs appeared before this specific subcommittee.
  • The subcommittee is reviewing policies related to accessions, recruiting, assignments, benefits, and career development.
  • The hearing addressed the 50th anniversary of the All-Volunteer Force.
  • The committee is examining current difficulties in retaining talent and challenges within the military recruiting enterprise.
Show all 6 facts
  • The hearing included testimony from the personnel chiefs of the Navy, Marine Corps, Space Force, Air Force, and Army.
  • The record includes data on recruiting and retention numbers for Fiscal Year 2022 through March 2022.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing is intended to gather information from military personnel chiefs to inform the development of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024.
Who testified at this hearing?
The personnel chiefs from the U.S. Navy, Marine Corps, Space Force, Air Force, and Army provided testimony.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Resumption of Personnel Chief Hearings

The subcommittee noted that this is the first time since 2019 that service personnel chiefs have appeared before this specific subcommittee, indicating a shift in oversight frequency.

Connected Entities

Richard J. Cheeseman, Jr., Douglas F. Stitt, Department of Defense and 5 more
PersonRichard J. Cheeseman, Jr.“Vice Admiral, Chief of Naval Personnel”Map →
PersonDouglas F. Stitt“Lieutenant General, Deputy Chief of Staff, G1, U.S. Army”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Defense“Federal department overseeing military operations”Map →
PersonJim Banks“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Military Personnel”Map →
PersonCaroline M. Miller“Lieutenant General, Deputy Chief of Staff for Manpower, Personnel, and Services,”Map →
PersonAndy Kim“Ranking Member of the Subcommittee”Map →
PersonJames F. Glynn“Lieutenant General, Deputy Commandant for Manpower and Reserve Affairs, USMC”Map →
PersonKatharine Kelley“Deputy Chief of Space Operations for Human Capital, U.S. Space Force”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record