Congressional Hearing on the Death of Liu Xiaobo
January 1, 2017
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The hearing serves as an official record of the U.S. government's formal stance and investigation into the death of a Nobel Peace Prize winner while held by the Chinese government, impacting diplomatic relations and international human rights policy.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Chinese Government
The government is the subject of the subcommittee's investigation and criticism regarding its human rights practices.
Human Rights Advocates
These groups are involved in the advocacy and documentation of the issues discussed during the hearing.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing was held on July 14, 2017, by the Subcommittee on Africa, Global Health, Global Human Rights, and International Organizations.
- Liu Xiaobo was the first Nobel Peace Prize winner to die in state custody since Carl von Ossietzky.
- Liu Xiaobo had been imprisoned by the Chinese government since 2009.
- The subcommittee chairman explicitly blamed the Chinese government for Liu Xiaobo's death.
- The hearing included testimony from three expert witnesses: Yang Jianli, Jared Genser, and Perry Link.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why was this hearing held?
Who testified at the hearing?
Why It Matters
The hearing serves as an official record of the U.S. government's formal stance and investigation into the death of a Nobel Peace Prize winner while held by the Chinese government, impacting diplomatic relations and international human rights policy.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Congressional Focus on Individual Human Rights Cases
The hearing demonstrates a specific legislative focus on individual high-profile human rights cases as a tool for foreign policy pressure.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance80How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy85Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment20Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz30Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools