House Subcommittee Hearing on Unconventional Monetary Policy
January 1, 2018
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The hearing provides a public record of expert testimony regarding how Federal Reserve policies influence the U.S. economy, interest rates, and financial stability.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Federal Reserve
The agency's policies were the subject of expert testimony and congressional oversight.
U.S. House Committee on Financial Services
The committee conducted the hearing to gather information for legislative oversight.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on December 7, 2016, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
- The hearing was conducted by the Subcommittee on Monetary Policy and Trade, part of the House Committee on Financial Services.
- Four expert witnesses provided testimony: John Taylor, Charles Plosser, Mickey D. Levy, and Simon Johnson.
- The hearing record includes prepared statements from all four witnesses.
- The record includes written responses to questions for the record from Mickey D. Levy and Charles Plosser.
- The record includes written responses from Chair Janet Yellen regarding a previous hearing held on September 28, 2016.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is 'unconventional monetary policy'?
Can I read the testimony provided at this hearing?
Why It Matters
The hearing provides a public record of expert testimony regarding how Federal Reserve policies influence the U.S. economy, interest rates, and financial stability.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Historical Record Linkage
The hearing record includes follow-up responses from Chair Yellen regarding a separate hearing held months prior, showing the continuity of oversight.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance40How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools