POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Missouri bill bans state enforcement of red flag gun seizure orders and imposes $50,000 civil penalties on agencies

Original title: ANTI-RED FLAG GUN SEIZURE ACT

Last action · May 15, 2026: Referred: Emerging Issues(H)Sponsors: Burt Whaley and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

House Bill 1683 prohibits all Missouri state agencies, political subdivisions, and local law enforcement from enforcing federal or state red flag gun seizure laws, orders of protection, or confiscation directives. The measure blocks local agencies from receiving federal funds intended to enforce s and subjects violating employers to a $50,000 civil penalty per occurrence.

Why it matters

Local law enforcement agencies and political subdivisions face direct financial liability and civil lawsuits with a $50,000 penalty per violation if their officers enforce firearm confiscation orders, while residents gain the right to sue for injunctions and damages without defenses.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Missouri residents

Residents gain legal standing to sue agencies for injunctive relief and damages if red flag laws are enforced against them.

Directly affected

Local law enforcement agencies

Agencies are barred from enforcing firearm seizure orders and face $50,000 civil penalties per occurrence for non-compliance.

Directly affected

Political subdivisions

Political subdivisions are prohibited from receiving federal grant moneys intended for enforcing red flag laws.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does HB 1683 prohibit local law enforcement from doing?
The bill prohibits state agencies, political subdivisions, and local law enforcement agencies from enforcing any federal or state , federal order of protection, or other judicial confiscation order targeting firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition of law-abiding citizens.
Can police still seize firearms as part of a criminal investigation?
Yes. The act explicitly states that nothing prevents firearms, accessories, or ammunition from being seized as evidence by law enforcement in the course of an investigation.
What are the financial penalties for a law enforcement agency that violates this act?
A political subdivision or law enforcement agency that employs an officer who knowingly violates the act is liable to the affected party and subject to a civil penalty of $50,000 per occurrence, along with potential attorney's fees and damages.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. May 15, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
  2. Jan 8, 2026HouseFloor
    Read Second Time (H)
  3. Jan 7, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read First Time (H)
  4. Dec 1, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Prefiled (H)

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Joseph Engler, General Assembly, Burt Whaley and 1 more
PersonJoseph Engler“Chief Clerk of the House”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“The legislative body enacting the bill”Map →
PersonBurt Whaley“Representative introducing HB 1683”Map →
PersonJohn Hewkin“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy85
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz60
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record