POLISCOPE
Back to feed

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Currently in_committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Last action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.Jul 23, 2025

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

The bill authorizes $5 million in annual federal spending from 2026 through 2030 to track fish populations, which directly impacts the management of a regional fishery economy valued at over $7 billion.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Great Lakes States (IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, PA, NY, WI)

State management agencies are required to collaborate with the federal program and will receive data to inform fishery management decisions.

Indian Tribes

Tribal fish management agencies are required to collaborate with the program and will receive data to support tribal fisheries.

Commercial and Recreational Fishery Industries

These industries are the intended beneficiaries of improved fishery management and restoration efforts supported by the program's data.

What changed

Current stage: in_committee.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

This bill establishes a formal program within the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to tag hatchery-raised fish released into the Great Lakes. The program aims to help scientists and managers track the balance between hatchery and wild fish populations to improve fishery management and habitat restoration.

Key Facts

  • Authorizes $5 million in federal funding annually for fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
  • Establishes the 'Great Lakes Mass Marking Program' within the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
  • Authorizes the Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to purchase equipment, fish tags, and hire additional personnel.
  • Requires the program to collaborate with Federal, State, and Tribal fish management agencies.
  • Mandates that data collected be shared with management agencies to assist in restoration and fishery objectives.
  • Notes that approximately 21 million hatchery-produced fish are stocked in the Great Lakes annually.
  • Notes that current marking efforts (as of 2010) tag 9 to 11 million fish annually.
  • Identifies the Great Lakes regional economy as being valued at over $7 billion.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is 'mass marking'?
It is the process of using automated technology to tag so they can be distinguished from wild fish in the Great Lakes.
Why is this program being established?
To help agencies understand the effectiveness of hatchery operations, balance predator and prey populations, and support the recovery of native species.
Who will manage this program?
The Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service will manage the program in collaboration with state, tribal, and other federal agencies.

Why It Matters

The bill authorizes $5 million in annual federal spending from 2026 through 2030 to track fish populations, which directly impacts the management of a regional fishery economy valued at over $7 billion.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Voting Record

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Formalization of Existing Effort

The bill formalizes and provides dedicated funding for a program that has been operating on a limited, cooperative scale since 2010.

Connected Entities

organizationGreat Lakes Fishery CommissionCollaborative body involved in fishery management.Map →
personMrs. DingellPrimary sponsor of the bill.Map →
personMr. HuizengaCo-sponsor of the bill.Map →
organizationUnited States Fish and Wildlife ServiceThe agency responsible for implementing the program.Map →
personMr. WalbergCo-sponsor of the bill.Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.congress.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy5
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record