POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Lobbying Payment Disclosure: California Legislative Conference on Interior Design

Original title: NOSSAMAN GUTHNER KNOX & ELLIOTT LLP lobbying for CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE CONFERENCE ON INTERIOR DESIGN

Record date · June 20, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document discloses a $6,000 payment made to the law firm Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP by the California Legislative Conference on Interior Design for the first quarter of 2000. The payment was for services rendered prior to the termination of the lobbying relationship in 1998.

Why it matters

This disclosure clarifies that the $6,000 payment represents the settlement of a past-due invoice for historical lobbying services rather than active lobbying activity during the reporting period.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP

The firm received a $6,000 payment for historical services.

Directly affected

California Legislative Conference on Interior Design

The organization fulfilled a financial obligation for past-due lobbying invoices.

Key Facts

  • The reporting period for this disclosure is January 1, 2000, through March 31, 2000.
  • The total payment amount received by Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP was $6,000.
  • The payment was for a past-due invoice related to services provided before June 30, 1998.
  • The lobbying relationship between the firm and the California Legislative Conference on Interior Design was terminated prior to June 30, 1998.
Show all 5 facts
  • There was no active lobbying activity conducted by the firm for this client during the reporting period.

Frequently Asked Questions

Was this firm actively lobbying for the California Legislative Conference on Interior Design in early 2000?
No, the document states that the lobbying relationship had been terminated prior to June 30, 1998.
Why was this $6,000 payment made?
The payment was made to settle a past-due invoice for services provided before the lobbying contract ended in 1998.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

financial connection100% confidence

Delayed Payment Settlement

The document highlights a significant time gap (nearly two years) between the termination of services and the payment of the final invoice.

Connected Entities

California Legislative Conference on Interior Design, Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP

Sources

Open source document

www.sos.ca.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance10
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy0
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment0
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz0
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record