Congressional Hearing: Member Day on the Opioid Crisis
January 1, 2018
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This hearing served as a formal platform for members of Congress to propose legislative solutions to the opioid crisis, which influences the development of future federal health policy and funding priorities.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Members of Congress
Members participated by providing testimony and legislative proposals for consideration by the subcommittee.
House Subcommittee on Health
The subcommittee organized and conducted the hearing to inform future legislative action.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing was held on October 11, 2017, by the House Subcommittee on Health.
- The purpose of the hearing was to receive testimony and proposals from members of Congress regarding the opioid crisis.
- The hearing is identified as Serial No. 115-64.
- Numerous members of Congress, including committee leadership and other representatives, submitted prepared statements and testimony.
- The proceedings were conducted under the authority of the Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a 'Member Day' hearing?
What was the primary focus of this hearing?
Why It Matters
This hearing served as a formal platform for members of Congress to propose legislative solutions to the opioid crisis, which influences the development of future federal health policy and funding priorities.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Broad Congressional Engagement
The hearing format allowed for a wide range of members from different states to contribute, indicating a broad legislative interest in opioid policy at the time.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools