POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofCrimes →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Michigan Bill Allows Police to Request ID from Individuals Wearing Face Coverings During Unlawful Acts or Intimidation

Original title: Crimes: other; request for identification from an individual wearing a mask or face covering device; allow.

Last action · June 26, 2025: bill electronically reproduced 06/25/2025Sponsors: Jason Woolford and 5 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Law enforcement officers in Michigan are authorized to stop individuals wearing masks or face coverings and request identification if the face covering is used to threaten or intimidate others or while committing a state law or local ordinance violation. Refusing to comply with this request is classified as a punishable by up to one year in prison, a fine of up to $2,500, or both.

Why it matters

Establishes a new statutory authority for peace officers to demand identification from masked individuals under specific circumstances, creating a distinct criminal penalty for noncompliance that differs from existing penalties for concealing identity during a crime.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

peace officers

Law enforcement officers receive explicit statutory authority to stop masked individuals and request identification under specified conditions.

Directly affected

individuals wearing masks or face coverings

Masked individuals are subject to police stops, requests to remove face coverings, demands for identification under specific circumstances, and new misdemeanor penalties for noncompliance.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

When can a law enforcement officer ask a masked individual for identification?
An officer can request ID if the person is wearing a face covering to threaten, intimidate, injure, or oppress others, or while violating a state law or local ordinance.
What are the penalties for refusing an officer's request to remove a mask and provide ID?
Refusing to comply is a punishable by up to 1 year in prison, a fine of up to $2,500.00, or both.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Jun 26, 2025House
    bill electronically reproduced 06/25/2025
  2. Jun 25, 2025HouseCommittee
    referred to Committee on Judiciary
  3. Jun 25, 2025HouseIntroduced
    read a first time
  4. Jun 25, 2025HouseIntroduced
    introduced by Representative Rep. Jason Woolford

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Jason Woolford, Jay DeBoyer, Luke Meerman and 4 more
PersonJason Woolford“Primary sponsor of House Bill 4680”Map →
PersonJay DeBoyer“Cosponsor of House Bill 4680”Map →
PersonLuke Meerman“Cosponsor of House Bill 4680”Map →
PersonTom Kunse“Cosponsor of House Bill 4680”Map →
PersonRon Robinson“Cosponsor of House Bill 4680”Map →
locationMichigan“State where the legislation is introduced and applies”Map →
PersonBill Schuette“Cosponsor of House Bill 4680”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.mi.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz50
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record