The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Michigan Bill Allows Police to Request ID from Individuals Wearing Face Coverings During Unlawful Acts or Intimidation
Last action · June 26, 2025: bill electronically reproduced 06/25/2025Sponsors: Jason Woolford and 5 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
Law enforcement officers in Michigan are authorized to stop individuals wearing masks or face coverings and request identification if the face covering is used to threaten or intimidate others or while committing a state law or local ordinance violation. Refusing to comply with this request is classified as a punishable by up to one year in prison, a fine of up to $2,500, or both.
Establishes a new statutory authority for peace officers to demand identification from masked individuals under specific circumstances, creating a distinct criminal penalty for noncompliance that differs from existing penalties for concealing identity during a crime.
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
peace officers
Law enforcement officers receive explicit statutory authority to stop masked individuals and request identification under specified conditions.
individuals wearing masks or face coverings
Masked individuals are subject to police stops, requests to remove face coverings, demands for identification under specific circumstances, and new misdemeanor penalties for noncompliance.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
When can a law enforcement officer ask a masked individual for identification?
What are the penalties for refusing an officer's request to remove a mask and provide ID?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.
Procedural history
4 actions- Jun 26, 2025Housebill electronically reproduced 06/25/2025
- Jun 25, 2025HouseCommitteereferred to Committee on Judiciary
- Jun 25, 2025HouseIntroducedread a first time
- Jun 25, 2025HouseIntroducedintroduced by Representative Rep. Jason Woolford
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Show 1 more sponsor
Connected Entities
Sources
legislature.mi.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance60How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy75Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz50Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
