Lobbying Disclosure: Family Winemakers of California (Q2 2000)
June 20, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The document identifies the specific legislative bills and budget items that the Family Winemakers of California sought to influence during the second quarter of 2000, involving a total payment of $11,107.29.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Family Winemakers of California
The organization paid for lobbying services to influence specific state legislation and budget items.
Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP
The firm received payment to provide lobbying services for the client.
Last recorded activity June 20, 2026.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- Total lobbying payments for the period of 4/1/2000 to 6/30/2000 were $11,107.29.
- The lobbying firm Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP represented the Family Winemakers of California.
- Lobbying activity focused on Assembly Bills (AB): 683, 1790, 2170, 2435, 2468, and 2520.
- Lobbying activity focused on Senate Bills (SB): 671, 1232, 1423, 1445, 1511, 1535, and 2085.
- Lobbying activity included advocacy regarding ABC (Alcoholic Beverage Control) fees.
- Lobbying activity included advocacy regarding state budget item #8570-090.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much did the Family Winemakers of California spend on lobbying during this period?
What specific issues were the lobbyists working on?
Why It Matters
The document identifies the specific legislative bills and budget items that the Family Winemakers of California sought to influence during the second quarter of 2000, involving a total payment of $11,107.29.
News Coverage
Lobbying Activity
Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP
on behalf of Family Winemakers of California
Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP
on behalf of Family Winemakers of California
NOSSAMAN GUTHNER KNOX & ELLIOTT LLP
on behalf of FAMILY WINEMAKERS OF CALIFORNIA
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Broad Legislative Engagement
The client engaged in lobbying across a wide range of 13 different pieces of legislation simultaneously during this quarter.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.sos.ca.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance30How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools