POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Congressional Hearing on U.S.-China Technology Competition

Original title: COUNTERING CHINA: ENSURING AMERICA REMAINS THE WORLD LEADER IN ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES AND INNOVATION

January 1, 2018

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing addresses the federal government's assessment of economic risks posed by Chinese trade practices, which are estimated to cost the U.S. economy between $225 billion and $600 billion annually in intellectual property theft.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

American technology companies

These companies face potential requirements to enter joint ventures to access Chinese markets and are targets of intellectual property theft.

Chinese government

The government is the subject of the subcommittee's investigation regarding its economic and industrial policies.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Subcommittee on Information Technology held a hearing to examine China's strategies for technological dominance and the impact on U.S. economic and national security. The discussion focused on intellectual property theft, market access coercion, and the 'Made in China 2025' initiative.

Key Facts

  • The U.S. Trade Representative estimates Chinese intellectual property theft costs the U.S. between $225 billion and $600 billion annually.
  • The 'Made in China 2025' initiative, introduced in 2015, aims to modernize the Chinese economy and establish China as a global leader in manufacturing.
  • The hearing examined allegations that China coerces American companies into joint ventures with Chinese firms as a condition for market access.
  • The hearing was held on September 26, 2018, by the Subcommittee on Information Technology.
  • The subcommittee's focus for this hearing was specifically on next-generation information technology.

Why It Matters

This hearing addresses the federal government's assessment of economic risks posed by Chinese trade practices, which are estimated to cost the U.S. economy between $225 billion and $600 billion annually in intellectual property theft.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the 'Made in China 2025' initiative?
It is a Chinese government policy introduced in 2015 aimed at modernizing the Chinese economy and making China the world leader in manufacturing and advanced technology.
What is the primary concern regarding U.S. companies operating in China?
The subcommittee discussed concerns that American companies are coerced into entering s with Chinese firms as a requirement to gain access to the Chinese market.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Shift in U.S.-China Engagement

The hearing marks a formal pivot from a 40-year policy of encouraging China's integration into the global economy toward a strategy of countering Chinese technological competition.

Connected Entities

personXi JinpingPresident of ChinaMap →
personRob AtkinsonWitness, President of Information Technology and Innovation FoundationMap →
personDean ChengWitness, Senior Research Fellow at The Heritage FoundationMap →
personSarah CookWitness, Senior Research Analyst at Freedom HouseMap →
personWill HurdChairman of the Subcommittee on Information TechnologyMap →
organizationUnited States Trade RepresentativeConducted a seven-month investigation into Chinese IP theftMap →
personJohn NeufferWitness, President and CEO of Semiconductor Industry AssociationMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record